Search for: "Reed v. Rhodes" Results 1 - 20 of 27
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2011, 9:00 pm
In a report we released last year, we outlined why the reasoning underlying these laws is constitutionally suspect: In Quill Corp. v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 6:15 am by Allison Trzop
Briefly: At Constitution Daily, Lyle discusses how recent events in Rhode Island and Delaware, which became the tenth and eleventh states to allow same-sex marriage, may influence the Justices as they decide Hollingsworth v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
The only media law judgment in the Supreme Court was in the remarkable case of OPO v Rhodes ([2015] 2 WLR 1373) – the subject of two of our most popular posts of the year by Dan Tench (on the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court decisions). [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 3:08 pm
Bill Moyers' Journal on 4 Sept 09 had a debate of sorts between Trevor Potter and Floyd Abrams over issues surrounding Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In the following guest post from John Reed Stark, President, John Reed Stark Consulting LLC, and David R. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Sandy Levinson
  (Its approval was by the less-than-inspiring vote of 34-32, and one might surmise that the crucial two votes that precluded yet another rejection by Rhode Islanders was the fact that Congress was threatening to pass a law prohibiting commercial intercourse with the juridically “foreign country” of Rhode Island. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
  Because doing the job right would require research well beyond prescription medical products, we looked for research help, and enterprising (pun intended) Reed Smith associate Kevin Hara stepped up to handle the initial spadework. [read post]
A case that has not just clarified, but in effect re-written, the rules on a fundamental principle of contractual law is the seminal case of Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi and ParkingEye Limited v Beavis [2015] UKSC 67 (Case Comment here). [read post]