Search for: "Reed v. State" Results 201 - 220 of 2,322
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Today, 24 January 2019, five Supreme Court judges (Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear Stocker v Stocker UKSC 2018/0045, an appeal against the 12 February 2018 Court of Appeal decision of Lady Justice Sharp, with whom Lord Justice McFarlane and Sir John Laws concurred ([2018] EWCA Civ 170). [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 4:25 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Secretary of State for the Home Department v Munir and anor, heard 24 – 27 April 2012. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by Tim Springer
  Austin Texas Disability law firm Bemis, Roach & Reed provides legal services to disabled individuals throughout the State of Texas. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 6:18 am
Nonetheless, Reed was thought to have had problems with aspects of the holding in Brown v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 3:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Giving the lead judgment Lord Reed stated that the decisions taken to authorise the segregation under the Prison Rules 1999, rule 45(2), was not taken by the Secretary of State but instead by a senior prison officer. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
., forthcoming Georgia Law Review/SSRN via Stephen McConnell, Reed Smith/JD Supra] “Will SCOTUS Ruling Affect Philadelphia Court, Where 94% Of New Plaintiffs Are From Out Of State? [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 6:25 am
Clark of Worrall & Greear, PC, Worland, Wyoming.Representing Appellee Reuter: Mary Helen Reed of McCarty, Reed and Earhart, LC, Cody, Wyoming. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 2:47 am by Dr Jeremias Prassl
Wider Implications The proceedings in Hook v British Airways and Stott v Thomas Cook have already attracted significant attention from the Equality and Human Rights Commission; with the Secretary of State acting as a further intervener. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:05 am by JULIE BALL, TRAINEE, MATRIX CHAMBERS
On Monday and Tuesday, the 3 and 4 December 2018, the Supreme Court (Lady Hale, Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson, Lord Sumption, Lord Carnwath, and Lord Lloyd-Jones) will hear Privacy International’s appeal (UKSC 2018/0004) against the Court of Appeal’s decision in R (Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal ([2017] EWCA Civ 1868; [2018] 1 WLR 2572), which found that the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (“RIPA 2000”), s 67(8)… [read post]
12 May 2020, 11:01 am by Andrew Hamm
This week we highlight petitions pending before the Supreme Court that involve, among other things, whether a sign regulation containing an exception for on-premises signs violates the First Amendment under the Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in Reed v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 1:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
” Dissent in Murdock v Pennsylvania Justice Reed authored a dissent, in which Justices Frankfurter, Jackson, and Roberts joined. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 11:47 am
Perjury while testifying during a §3020-a disciplinary hearing results in court vacating the underlying arbitration awardPhelps-Clifton Springs CSD v Nicot, Supreme Court, Ontario County, Index #103465, Justice Frederick G. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 7:44 am by christopher
United States, 144 U.S. 47, 59 (1892)United States v. [read post]