Search for: "Reed v. State" Results 281 - 300 of 2,147
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2014, 1:43 pm by Lisa Baird
Over on the Drug & Device Law blog, Reed Smith partner Eric Alexander calls attention to Booker v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 12:00 pm by Blog Editorial
In Courtroom 1, Gale and another v Serious Organised Crime Agency is to be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Judge, Clarke, Dyson and Reed. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Supreme Court’s sleeper case of the term, Reed v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
” Supported by the interveners – Bail for Immigration Detainees and Medical Justice – O successfully argued that the authority of R (Francis) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Bail for Immigration Detainees intervening) [2014] EWCA Civ 718 had been wrongly decided. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 8:02 am by Jonathan H. Adler
This morning the Supreme Court decided two cases in which Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote the majority opinion and Justice Neil Gorsuch dissented: Reed v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 7:48 pm by constitutional lawblogger
Wa.) last week issued a temporary restraining order to prevent the Washington Secretary of State from releasing names and addresses of supporters of R-71, the referendum measure to overturn Washington's domestic partnership law, until the court... [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 3:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
It is undisputed that the defendants failed to submit such "documentary evidence" when they filed the underlying claim in the Court of Claims and that the underlying claim was dismissed based on that pleading defect (Reed v State of New York, [*2]78 NY2d 1, 7; Gioeli v State of New York, 39 AD3d 815; Piccarreto v State of New York, 144 AD2d 920, 921; Heiss v State of New York, 143 AD2d 67, 69; Ivey v… [read post]
Lord Reed noted that this was contrary to the principle under UK administrative law that a statutory power must be exercised by the person on whom the power has been conferred (R v Deputy Governor of Parkhurst Prison ex parte Hague [1990] UKHL 8 and Leech v Deputy Governor of Parkhurst Prison [1988] UKHL 16 cited). [read post]