Search for: "Reed v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,351
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2024, 11:05 am
United States and Duffey v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 3:36 am
Off-White also claimed that batches of this sizes were commonly resold on platforms like Marktplaats, Instagram, and Facebook.With reference to judgments by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Arsenal v Reed (C-206/01) EU:C:2002:651 and C-324/09 L'Oréal v eBay EU:C:2011:474, the District Court of The Hague held that “use in the course of trade” is when the use takes place in the context of a commercial activity in pursuit of a… [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 8:00 am
TaxProf Blog Op-Eds on Moore v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 1:56 am
As mentioned above, on Thursday 20 June 2024 the UK Supreme Court (Lords Reed, Sales, Hamblen, Burrows and Richards) handed down a unanimous judgment in the case of Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Styen J handed down judgement in the case of Prospect v Evans [2024] EWHC 1533 (KB). [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
In the case of McKnight v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 7:20 pm
May allow state regulations to fill the gaps, which would create more of a patchwork approach for purposes of compliance across states. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm
The claimant, who formerly worked as a recruitment consultant for the defendant’s agency, sued the defendant for an email she sent to her new employer, stating that she was in breach of her contract by contacting her old clients. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
Reed and Russell M. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
Reed and Russell M. [read post]
28 May 2024, 5:00 am
In the case of C.M. v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 5:01 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
2 May 2024, 6:00 am
Citing Schiano v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 6:00 am
Citing Schiano v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:30 am
” The Court’s decision in Roe v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 5:38 am
From Judge Reed O'Connor's decision today in Sabal v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 8:55 am
Ross (468 U.S. 1) to overcome respondent Commissioner of Correction's special defense of procedural default; claim that, because decision in State v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 7:28 pm
Dobbs’ reversal of Roe v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 10:31 am
The Court of Appeals has rejected a sexual harassment claim, holding that the plaintiff has not sufficiently alleged quid pro quo harassment in trying to assert that the company president was trying to initiate a sexual relationship.The case is Reed v. [read post]
