Search for: "Reed v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 2,315
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2023, 5:27 am by Unreported Opinions
The court imposed a sentence of life imprisonment on the murder count, and a three-year consecutive […] The post CHARLES RAY REED v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:55 am by Ben Sperry
What I want to highlight is Reed’s use of terms like “friction,” “restriction,” and “cost” to describe how COPPA affects the behavior of parents, children, and social-media platforms. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 5:44 am by Kevin LaCroix
(Please note that these figures do not include state court securities class action lawsuit filings.) [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 2:04 am by Alessandro Cerri
" The Court noted that it had to be guided by the evidence, regardless of the motive driving such evidence, and held that on CSL’s own evidence AC Cars' use of the sign “Cobra” could not have affected the essential function of either of the Ford Cobra Marks as a guarantee of origin (see Arsenal v Reed). [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 6:25 am by Walter Shaub
Meadows to the State of Georgia’s Response to his Notice of Removal at 1, State of Georgia v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm by Sherica Celine
Practical Guidance Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Related Content Corporations across the United States are evaluating how they manage diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policies in the workplace in light of the recent Supreme Court decision striking down affirmative action policies on the basis of race in education, ( Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 6:05 am by Patryk I. Labuda
Both Germany and the United States have advocated the “hybrid” route, with U.S. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 4:18 am by Eric Segall
United States, in which the Could upheld the forced relocation of all people of Japanese descent on the West Coast just because of their ancestry. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
The Tenth Circuit held that, whether viewed as compelled speech or as a content-based restriction, the restriction had to – and did – satisfy strict scrutiny: Colorado could show that it has a compelling interest, and that the restriction is narrowly tailored to satisfy that interest (Reed v Town of Gilbert 576 US 155, 164 (2015)). [read post]