Search for: "Reese v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 124
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2018, 6:28 am
”[3] In South Carolina, “unprepared food that lawfully may be purchased with United States Department of Agriculture food coupons” is exempt from the state’s sales and use tax.[4] Meanwhile, other states categorize sales tax status based primarily on who the vendor is or where the food is consumed. [read post]
12 May 2018, 12:37 pm
Some may remember United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 9:46 am
The Ninth then decided United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:32 am
For The Washington Post, Ellen Nakashima reports that the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 11:39 am
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 3:33 am
United States, which asks when erroneous applications of the U.S. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 9:15 am
Reese. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 8:05 am
United States 17-5165 Issue: Whether Richardson v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 11:16 am
United States, 17-5165 Issue: Whether Richardson v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 11:40 am
United States 17-5165 Issue: Whether Richardson v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:51 am
Garza, 17-654 Issue: Whether, pursuant to United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:09 pm
The case is styled In re Pacific Drilling S.A., et al., and is case number 17-13193 pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:09 pm
The case is styled In re Pacific Drilling S.A., et al., and is case number 17-13193 pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am
The COA did, in fact, foreclose on the unit. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm
§ 337(a) (“[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of [the FDCA] shall be by and in the name of the United States”); see POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm
§ 337(a) (“[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of [the FDCA] shall be by and in the name of the United States”); see POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 7:58 am
State v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 7:53 am
State v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 8:19 am
I talked about one of the supposed “favors felons” cases, United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm
” United States v. [read post]
