Search for: "Reese v. York"
Results 1 - 20
of 62
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2016, 6:12 am
Briere v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 1:23 pm
Reese does not allege that these statements are untrue individually. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 3:09 am
Public benefit corporations are subject to the Open Meetings Law and the Freedom of Information Law as long as they remain public benefit corporationsMatter of Reese v Daines, 62 AD3d 1254Ellen Reese and a number of others filed a petition in Supreme Court seeking to compel Western New York Health Systems, Inc. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:09 pm
Reese can be found by clicking here: Download Pacific Drilling - Paul T. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:09 pm
Reese can be found by clicking here: Download Pacific Drilling - Paul T. [read post]
12 May 2009, 4:15 am
Public benefit corporations are subject to the Open Meetings Law and the Freedom of Information Law as long as they remain public benefit corporationsMatter of Reese v Daines, 2009 NY Slip Op 03569, decided on May 1, 2009, Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentEllen Reese and a number of others filed a petition in Supreme Court seeking to compel Western New York Health Systems, Inc. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
Entities subject to the Open Meetings Law and the Freedom of Information LawMatter of Reese v Daines, 2008 NY Slip Op 51879(U), decided on September 15, 2008, Supreme Court, Erie County, Patrick H. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Entities subject to the Open Meetings Law and the Freedom of Information Law Reese v Daines, 20 Misc 3d 1145(A) Justice NeMoyer’s ruling in the Reese case provides summaries of the basic issues and case law involved in satisfying the mandates of New York’s Open Meetings Law (OML) (Public Officers Law § 100 et seq) and its Freedom of Information Law (FOIL), Public Officers Law Section 84 et. seq. [read post]
5 Mar 2022, 3:58 am
The Supreme Court [of the United States] subsequently rejected such inferences as incompatible with ordinary contract principles under federal law in M and G Polymers USA, LLC v Tackett (574 US 427 [2015]) and CNH Industrial N.V. v Reese (583 US 138 S Ct 761 [2018]), repudiating International Union, United Auto., Aerospace, and Agric. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
The Supreme Court [of the United States] subsequently rejected such inferences as incompatible with ordinary contract principles under federal law in M and G Polymers USA, LLC v Tackett (574 US 427 [2015]) and CNH Industrial N.V. v Reese (583 US 138 S Ct 761 [2018]), repudiating International Union, United Auto., Aerospace, and Agric. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
The Supreme Court [of the United States] subsequently rejected such inferences as incompatible with ordinary contract principles under federal law in M and G Polymers USA, LLC v Tackett (574 US 427 [2015]) and CNH Industrial N.V. v Reese (583 US 138 S Ct 761 [2018]), repudiating International Union, United Auto., Aerospace, and Agric. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 7:30 pm
In Donohue v Cuomo, 2022 NY Slip Op 00910, the New York State's Court of Appeals said:"In Kolbe v Tibbetts, [it] left open whether a New York court should infer vesting of retiree health insurance rights when construing a collective bargaining agreement* (CBA) (see 22 NY3d 344, 354 [2013]). [read post]
5 Mar 2022, 3:58 am
The Supreme Court [of the United States] subsequently rejected such inferences as incompatible with ordinary contract principles under federal law in M and G Polymers USA, LLC v Tackett (574 US 427 [2015]) and CNH Industrial N.V. v Reese (583 US 138 S Ct 761 [2018]), repudiating International Union, United Auto., Aerospace, and Agric. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 7:30 pm
In Donohue v Cuomo, 2022 NY Slip Op 00910, the New York State's Court of Appeals said:"In Kolbe v Tibbetts, [it] left open whether a New York court should infer vesting of retiree health insurance rights when construing a collective bargaining agreement* (CBA) (see 22 NY3d 344, 354 [2013]). [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
In Donohue v Cuomo, 2022 NY Slip Op 00910, the New York State's Court of Appeals said:"In Kolbe v Tibbetts, [it] left open whether a New York court should infer vesting of retiree health insurance rights when construing a collective bargaining agreement* (CBA) (see 22 NY3d 344, 354 [2013]). [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
In Donohue v Cuomo, 2022 NY Slip Op 00910, the New York State's Court of Appeals said:"In Kolbe v Tibbetts, [it] left open whether a New York court should infer vesting of retiree health insurance rights when construing a collective bargaining agreement* (CBA) (see 22 NY3d 344, 354 [2013]). [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 3:24 am
Games-Perez and U.S. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 3:11 am
Reese v Newman In a decision last month by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals in Reese v Newman, No. 14-CV-283 [D.C. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 3:11 am
Reese v Newman In a decision last month by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals in Reese v Newman, No. 14-CV-283 [D.C. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 3:11 am
Reese v Newman In a decision last month by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals in Reese v Newman, No. 14-CV-283 [D.C. [read post]
