Search for: "Reeve v. Howe" Results 101 - 120 of 240
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2013, 12:38 am by J
I confess to being a bit surprised by how much interest it has generated as I can’t see that it says anything much that is “new”:(a) in domestic law, this wouldn’t (necessarily) have been a case about the Directive/Regulations at all; a clause like this is so obviously a penalty clause (i.e. not a genuine pre-estimate of loss) that it’d be unenforceable at common law;(b) there is already plenty of domestic authority for the proposition that the… [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 12:38 am by J
I confess to being a bit surprised by how much interest it has generated as I can’t see that it says anything much that is “new”:(a) in domestic law, this wouldn’t (necessarily) have been a case about the Directive/Regulations at all; a clause like this is so obviously a penalty clause (i.e. not a genuine pre-estimate of loss) that it’d be unenforceable at common law;(b) there is already plenty of domestic authority for the proposition that the… [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 4:01 am by Administrator
Reeves, 2018 SCC 56 (37676) The police infringed Mr. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 10:57 pm
Fisher remains good law even after the Supreme Court appeared to reject "pretext plus" in Reeves v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 6:58 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
As the Court tells us in this case, "Reeves prevents courts from imposing a per se rule requiring in all instances that a claimant offer more than a prima facie case and evidence of pretext" (citing Cross v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 6:21 am by Adam Chandler
The AtlanticWire’s Elspeth Reeve rounds up commentary on Bush v. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 5:13 am by Garrett Hinck
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard arguments in Dalmazzi v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 8:13 am by Joy Waltemath
No. 15-1144), raising the question of whether the standard of proof established by Reeves v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 1:57 pm by Hyemin Han
  Stewart Baker sat down with Alan Rozenshtein and Adam Candeub for a deep dive of the NetChoice v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:50 am by Bryan Fears
Reeves, 227 U.S. 625 (1913); and Burlingham v. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 3:11 am by Peter Mahler
VC Glasscock’s Fair Value Determination in Wright v Phillips Wright v Phillips, C.A. [read post]