Search for: "Regents of Univ. of California v. Bakke"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe:
28 Jun 2017, 1:01 am
Supreme Court in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 1:01 am
Supreme Court in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 2:45 pm
[i] Regents of Univ. of California v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 6:20 am
To stick to the subject of affirmative action, we could consider Regents of the Univ of California v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 9:12 am
On two occasions, Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 7:27 am
Rev. 1065 (1997). [8] Regents of the Univ. of California v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
In his controlling opinion in the 1978 case of Regents of Univ. of California v. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 10:25 pm
Rather, she noted that Grutter got to the Supreme Court 25 years after Regents of Univ. of Calif. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
In the 37 years since the Supreme Court decided its first major case concerning race-based affirmative action in higher education, Regents of Univ. of California v. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 9:39 am
Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978), and Grutter v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 6:09 am
State v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 4:28 pm
Previously in Regents of Univ of Cal v Bakke (17 EPD ¶8402 (1978)), Justice Powell wrote in his solo opinion that the attainment of a “diverse student body” is a compelling state interest for an institution of higher education. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 6:15 am
Previously in Regents of Univ of Cal v Bakke, Justice Powell wrote in his solo opinion that the attainment of a “diverse student body” is a compelling state interest for an institution of higher education. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:33 pm
Constitution (Gratz v Bollinger, 84 EPD ¶41,416). [read post]
