Search for: "Reichert v. Reichert" Results 1 - 20 of 42
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2012, 9:59 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 12-0187, 2012 MT 111, ARLYNE REICHERT, WADE DAHOOD, JEAN BOWMAN, PATRICIA ROSENLEAF, SUSAN LUBBERS, JOAN HURDLE, ROBERT FILIPOVICH, KAREN RICHARDSON, DALE McGARVEY, JUDY MATHRE, MILLY GUTKOWSKI, GLADYS HARDIN, LOUISE DAVIS, and MERLIN DAVIS, Plainitffs and Appellees, v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 12:29 pm
 The City expressed (informally) its unwillingness to bend the rule for the Reicherts at the risk of hurting every other Huntington Beach citizen. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Reichert, Court of Appeals, 6th Circuit 2014 http://t.co/tbtIWfLJhP -> PSL v Gidani: charter right to freedom of expression not violated by copyright infringement http://t.co/qhOrpGiPzQ -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2014-04-16: Premier League drops copyright infringement case against You… http://t.co/snSzJBuHrP -> [read post]
Because NCS submitted only a conclusory declaration stating that it maintained procedures, we hold that it failed to establish a bona fide error defense under the FDCPA.Public Citizen's Deepak Gupta represented Richard Reichert in this appellate victory for consumers in the 9th circuit states. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 8:43 am
Recently, a federal appeals court held that debt collection agencies cannot avoid responsibility for abuses by blaming them on creditors.In the case of Reichert v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 5:00 am by Christina Reichert
 However, Voon finds a potential exception in GATS Article V, which deals with regional agreements. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 9:30 pm by Christina Reichert
 In an effort to address the Supreme Court’s 1996 holding in Leavitt v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:30 pm by Christina Reichert
  The bill is distinguishable from the legislative veto which the Supreme Court held unconstitutional in INS v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 6:09 am
Exactly how hollow a requirement this is has now been fully explained by the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania in Reichert v. [read post]