Search for: "Remijas v. Neiman Marcus Group, LLC"
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2015, 12:57 pm
Neiman Marcus Group, LLC, No. 14-3122. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 1:24 pm
Neiman Marcus Group, LLC, No. 14-3122. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 1:13 pm
Neiman Marcus Group, LLC, No. 14-3122. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 2:55 pm
Neiman Marcus Group, LLC, No. 14-3122. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:14 am
Neiman Marcus Group, LLC, 1:14-cv-01735. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 8:56 am
Neiman Marcus Group, LLC, No. 14 C1735 (7th Cir. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 12:53 pm
Enter Remijas v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:14 pm
The Neiman Marcus Decision While much has already been written about the Neiman Marcus opinion,[i] a few contextual details are in order. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 7:14 am
Khan v. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
Neiman Marcus Group, LLC, the district court dismissed a class action complaint against retailer Neiman Marcus based on the plaintiffs’ lack of Article III standing. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 11:59 am
The Neiman Marcus Group LLC. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 10:28 am
Neiman Marcus Group, LLC, No. 14 C 1735 (7th Cir. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:42 am
Neiman Marcus Group, LLC, 794 F.3d 688 (7th Cir. 2015). [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 9:51 pm
Neiman Marcus Group, 794 F.3d 688 (7th Cir 2015). [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:34 am
Corp. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 8:43 pm
Neiman Marcus Group, LLC, hackers stole approximately 350,000 credit card numbers from a luxury retailer, and fraud was discovered on approximately 9,200 of those cards. 794 F.3d 688, 689 (7th Cir. 2015). [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:30 am
Neiman Marcus Group, LLC, 794 F. 3d 688 (7th Cir. 2015), where the panel held that the alleged facts supported the conclusion that the risk of harm in the form of identity theft was not just possible but was actually “certainly impending,” distinguishing it from the facts at issue in Clapper. [read post]
