Search for: "Rentmeester v. Nike, Inc." Results 1 - 12 of 12
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2015, 9:02 am
  This question was recently answered by the District Court of Oregon in Jacobus Rentmeester v Nike Inc., (No.3 : 15-cv-00113-MO). [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 2:28 am by Ben
Rdio Inc and Google Play are also in the firing line. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 4:20 am by Ben
The case is Rentmeester  v Nike Inc., (No.3 : 15-cv-00113-MO). [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 12:25 am
In that case, fair use was limited to works that transformed the original through use of parody or satire - this is juxtaposes the current environment, which noticeably reduces the rights of photographers in their works through the expansion of fair use, as evident in Cariou v Prince in 2013, and Rentmeester v Nike, Inc. in 2018.This is further explored through an examination of the Andy Warhol case, which further illustrates the expansion of the fair use… [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 8:43 am by John Elwood
Nike, Inc., 18-728. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 11:19 am by John Elwood
Harris Funeral Homes Inc v. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 10:39 am by Aaron Moss
Unlike literary works such as novels, plays and motion pictures, the Ninth Circuit previously held in Rentmeester v. [read post]