Search for: "Reproductive Rights" Results 281 - 300 of 8,471
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Pozen persuasively argues the ways in which the Court’s approach to drugs differs from its treatment of issues like reproductive choice and gun rights. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Wachler & Associates, P.C.
The HHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR) has stated that it intends to publish model attestation language. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 6:30 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The New York State Court of Appeals has held that the City Human Rights Law, one of the most expansive in the nation, does not allow plaintiffs to sue co-workers for discrimination, including the creation of a hostile work environment.The case is Russell v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 6:36 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Jackson Women’s Health Organization on June 24, 2022, multiple state supreme courts have done their own “about face” on reproductive rights. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm by The Regulatory Review
The regulation is part of an effort to preserve the reproductive rights of women in the aftermath of the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
Reproductive Health Care The Privacy Rule now includes a definition of “reproductive health care” to include health care “that affects the health of the individual in all matters relating to the reproductive system and to its functions and processes. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 6:05 pm by Mark Ashton
These are reproductive rights cases but the Supreme Court said in Dobbs that these rights were to be state regulated. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 1:12 pm by ACLU
Not only does this definition negate the experiences of trans women and girls, but it also excludes entire categories of women who are not transgender, such as post-menopausal women, women experiencing reproductive challenges, and intersex women. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by Evelyn Tsisin
Biden implored of those attending his 2024 State of the Union address, referencing efforts by Congress to take away the reproductive rights of pregnant people. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 5:36 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
Attorney Benjamin Ikuta, right, listens as Brooke Berger speaks and Bennett Hardy listens during a news conference announcing a lawsuit against Newport Beach fertility clinic Ovation Fertility. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 5:58 am by Joseph J. Lazzarotti
On April 22, 2024, the federal Department of Health and Human Services’ Office for Civil Rights (OCR) announced a final rule enhancing privacy protections relating to reproductive health care. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 3:30 am by Emma Cave
Barry Lyons & Mary Donnelly, Life without Gillick: Adolescent sexual and reproductive healthcare in Ireland, available at Sage Journal of Clinical Ethics (Dec. 25, 2023). [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 6:59 am by Rick Garnett
Benedict understands that the dominant narrative of secular modernity, to the effect that everything valuable concerning the ratification and protection of human rights depends upon reason’s critique of and separation from Christianity, is entirely self-serving, and deliberately ignores the insights bequeathed to it by the Christian tradition. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
Women’s reproductive rights and the LGBTQIA+ community are under attack. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:19 pm by Gillian Thomas
When it comes to the rights of religious employers, abortion opponents also get an “F” in history. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 8:30 am by Unknown
"Care in Crisis: Failures to guarantee the sexual and reproductive health and rights of refugees from Ukraine in Hungary, Poland, Romania and Slovakia (Center for Reproductive Rights, April 2024) [access via ReliefWeb]- Report available in English and Hungarian. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:14 pm by Daly Barnett
Besides the obvious perils of stripping away half the country’s right to reproductive healthcare, digital surveillance and mass data collection caused a flurry of concerns. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 5:24 am by Joelle Boxer
” Fourth, the Court found gross violations of PAK and Mohammed’s constitutional rights, including a lack of reproductive healthcare (Article 43(1)), degrading and inhuman treatment (Article 25), lack of respect for dignity (Article 28), and lack of a fair hearing (Article 50). [read post]