Search for: "Reproductive Rights"
Results 81 - 100
of 7,723
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2023, 7:01 am
” In China, as a part of its repression of the Uyghur and other minority populations, the government has curtailed women’s reproductive rights; the Associated Press reported in 2020 that the government “regularly subjects minority women to pregnancy checks, and forces intrauterine devices, sterilization and even abortion on hundreds of thousands. [read post]
11 Feb 2023, 7:30 am
Opportunities:Panel discussion & book Launch: Human Rights and Gender Equality for Refugee Women, Lawson, Australia, 26 February 2023 [info]CFP: International Journal of Refugee Law [info]- Contributions sought for a thematic issue on the "legal aspects of gender in refugee protection. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 12:33 pm
Wade and took away our right to control our own bodies. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 3:30 am
As digital aggregation technologies enable the reproduction of millions of copyrighted works, they test law’s capacity to define, address, and compensate for infringements – as a matter of both doctrine and procedure. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 5:31 pm
But, Judge Kollar-Kotelly stated, it is “entirely possible that the Court might have held in Dobbs that some other provision of the Constitution provided a right to access reproductive services had that issue been raised. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 4:16 pm
Panelists will examine the impact of Dobbs on constitutional law and compare other countries' approaches to reproductive rights. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 2:30 am
Fish and Wildlife Service to do the right thing by preserving their protections. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 8:52 am
This includes access to prescription medications for reproductive health and other types of care. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 6:17 am
Wade to protect every woman’s constitutional right to choose,” Biden said. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:39 am
From reauthorizing the Violence Against Women Act, to the Electoral Count Reform Act, to the Respect for Marriage Act that protects the right to marry the person you love. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
Although all sitting jurors swore they could put aside anything they’d read or heard before and decide the case solely on the evidence and the law, 13 of the 16 had heard of the Proud Boys; at least five thought the group held “far-right,” “extremist,” or “radical” views; and three of the latter associated the group with “white supremacism. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 3:37 am
Due to the Health Directive’s ban, the Applicant alleges that his section 15 rights have been violated. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 8:54 pm
right. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 2:47 pm
The post “Symposium To Look at Reclaiming Reproductive Rights After Dobbs” appeared first on How Appealing. [read post]
Federal Judge Suggests Abortion May Be Protected Under 13th Amendment’s Ban on Involuntary Servitude
7 Feb 2023, 4:56 am
” However, she insists “it is entirely possible that the Court might have held in Dobbs that some other provision of the Constitution provided a right to access reproductive services had that issue been raised. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 4:00 am
[I]n consideration of the Supreme Court’s longstanding admonition against overapplying its own precedent, it is entirely possible that the Court might have held in Dobbs that some other provision of the Constitution provided a right to access reproductive services had that issue been raised. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 6:42 pm
Judge Kollar-Kotelly explained: Mindful that that this Court is bound by holdings, and in consideration of the Supreme Court's longstanding admonition against overapplying its own precedent, it is entirely possible that the Court might have held in Dobbs that some other provision of the Constitution provided a right to access reproductive services had that issue been raised. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 11:28 am
In its wake, the Dobbs decision left many questioning whether their most sensitive information—information relating to their reproductive health care—would remain private. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 8:30 am
Until 31 January 2023, an international mark required a “reproduction” of the mark, i.e. a graphic representation of the sign that literally fit into the box of WIPO’s application form. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 12:16 pm
Why provide that right? [read post]
