Search for: "Response Brief for the United States Regarding the Court's Order for Petitioner to Show Cause"
Results 1 - 20
of 127
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2015, 3:02 pm
As a result, the uncertainty regarding the Court’s jurisdiction could well persist and perhaps intensify, an unfortunate outcome for the parties, the Court, and the millions of low income families relying on the tax subsidies in order to afford health insurance.Rob Weiner, formerly Associate Deputy Attorney General in the United States Department of Justice, is a partner at Arnold & Porter LLP. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
The petitioners assert that marijuana’s Schedule I status is the only thing preventing courts from recognizing the defense, citing United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
The petitioners assert that marijuana’s Schedule I status is the only thing preventing courts from recognizing the defense, citing United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:11 am
” Brief that makes this argument: The United States, filed in support of vacatur. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com]No. 07-5439 IN THE Supreme Court of the United StatesRALPH BAZE, et al,Petitioners, v.JOHN D. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:49 pm
In Lyon v Lyon, 2012 WL 1970363 (D.Kan.) petitioner Kevin Lyon filed a Verified Petition for Return of Child to England and Issuance of Show Cause Order seeking the return of his three-year-old son, F.M.S.L., to England under the Hague Convention. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:49 pm
In Lyon v Lyon, 2012 WL 1970363 (D.Kan.) petitioner Kevin Lyon filed a Verified Petition for Return of Child to England and Issuance of Show Cause Order seeking the return of his three-year-old son, F.M.S.L., to England under the Hague Convention. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:28 pm
It is always to be exercised with due regard for the rights of others. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:22 am
The court ordered the United States to pay Windsor a judgment in the amount of $363,053, plus interest and costs. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:26 am
The court denied granting the habeas writ on the merits in part because the petitioners wanted relief beyond simple release and instead wanted the United States to protect them from criminal prosecution in Iraq. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 5:12 am
But just before settlement, the court issued an order denying CIA’s motion for summary judgment, holding that “Defendants’ relevant conduct touches and concerns the United States with sufficient force to overcome the presumption against extraterritorial application of the ATS. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 6:29 am
Finally, the doctrinal reason for not having the military commission review these two additional violations is found in United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:29 pm
United States, in which the Court appointed Jeffrey Sutton as an amicus to argue that the Court lacked (statutory) jurisdiction, since both the United States and the petitioner-defendant agreed that the Court had jurisdiction. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
§ 2254 (Dkt. 1); the response filed in opposition thereto (Dkt. 7); Petitioner’s Reply (Dkt. 11); the parties’ Supplemental Memoranda (Dkts. 25, 31, 36); and the Amicus Brief filed in support of Petitioner. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm
A close read of the brief, however, shows that Rothman’s critique of the assumption is equivocal. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 8:21 pm
” In its brief on the merits, the United States starts by reiterating that, under the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 am
ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT FOR BREVARD COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA INITIAL BRIEF OF APPELLANT MARK S. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 6:46 am
At issue are certified questions of state law from the United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio, Western Division. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 6:08 am
For example, they place the burden of proof on the petitioner; allow an ex parte order to last only a brief time; and require an adversarial hearing and a judicial finding of a risk of harm before a final order may be issued. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 8:28 am
Circuit denied the writ of mandamus filed in response to this order. [read post]
