Search for: "Response Brief for the United States Regarding the Court's Order for Petitioner to Show Cause"
Results 41 - 60
of 127
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2018, 3:00 pm
United States, 490 U.S. 858, 873-74 (1989); see also Fed. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
A state district court held, after an extensive hearing, that although Trump had “engaged in insurrection” on January 6, 2021, nevertheless he wasn’t subject to Section 3’s disqualification because, inter alia, he had not taken an oath as an “officer of the United States” and, indeed, has never served as an “officer of the United States. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:39 am
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/39254-2.10.doc.pdf Federal Law Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals: United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
Family Court granted petitioner’s application. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:50 pm
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Reply brief Adams v. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 8:19 am
BONA FIDE Truthfully, honestly and without deceit BRIEF A legal document presented to the court BURDEN OF PROOF One spouse must prove any claims made against the opposing spouse to the court. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 5:40 am
Slip Op. 03353 (2d Dept.,2023) Petitioner, a friend of the minor child’s family, commenced aproceeding to be appointed as the guardian of the child and subsequently moved for the issuance of an order enabling the child to petition the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) for special immigrant juvenile status. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm
” The case law that exists regarding adultery is restricted to trial judgments and appeals for much of the past century and more. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
But the government waived its right to file a responsive brief, so unless [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
U.S. 488 U.S. 361 (1988)Justice BLACKMUN delivered the opinion of the Court.In this litigation, we granted certiorari before judgment in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in order to consider the constitutionality of the Sentencing Guidelines promulgated by the United States Sentencing Commission. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 1:28 pm
In response to the new criminal charge the defendant moved to suppress the handgun as the fruit of an illegal warrantless search, arguing that a warrantless search of his residence was unconstitutional under the federal and state constitutions in that it was not authorized by statute or as a matter of consent. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 10:46 am
Ass’n of United States, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 5:01 am
” In pursuing relief from the Supreme Court, those petitioners seek to overturn a carefully calibrated process regarding the workings of the FISC designed to provide reasonable transparency into that court’s decisions while protecting classified information relating to intelligence sources and methods. [read post]
11 May 2018, 1:01 pm
“When reviewing a trial court order dismissing a cause for want of jurisdiction, Texas appellate courts ‘construe the pleadings in favor of the plaintiff and look to the pleader’s intent. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm
GARLAND GEORGE CURTIS, Defendant-Appellant. 11th Circuit.Criminal law -- Sentencing -- Unopposed motion for continuance of resentencing hearing pending review in United States Supreme Court of decision of United States Court of Appeals which obligates trial court to impose 30-year sentence rather than 17-and-a-half-year sentence initially imposed for offense of production of child pornography for transportation into this country --… [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
LEACH BUILDERS, LLC, ET AL., Petitioners, v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
LEACH BUILDERS, LLC, ET AL., Petitioners, v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
The state and the Park District jointly prepared the Eastshore State Park General Plan. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 9:43 am
Failure to give notice to a party of a trial setting violates the due process requirements of the United States Constitution. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 9:43 am
Failure to give notice to a party of a trial setting violates the due process requirements of the United States Constitution. [read post]
