Search for: "Reves v. Ernst & Young" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2021, 6:50 am by Mark Astarita
Ernst & Young, set forth the “family resemblance” test to determine whether a note is a security. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 3:15 am by John Jenkins
Ernst & Young featured prominently in the Court’s reasoning: In affirming the district court’s decision, the Second Circuit’s analysis focused on the Reves test. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 8:02 am by Doug Cornelius
Ernst & Young 110 S.Ct. 945 919900 To Be or Note to Be a Security: Reve v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 5:16 am by Doug Cornelius
Ernst & Young, 494 U.S. 56 (1990) Fletcher International, Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Ernst & Young, 494 U.S. 56, 63 (1990) when determining that the syndicated loan was not a security. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Ernst & Young, 494 U.S. 56 (1990).[11] In Reves, the Supreme Court held that “because the Securities Acts define ‘security’ to include ‘any note,’” courts “begin with a presumption that every note is a security. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
Ernst & Young, Inc., 494 U.S. 56 (1990).[1] The Notice states that: The MSRB is publishing this notice to alert municipal market participants that, under existing legal principles described below, certain financings that are called ‘bank loans’ may, in fact, be municipal securities. [read post]