Search for: "Reves v. Ernst & Young" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Ernst & Young, 494 U.S. 56 (1990).[11] In Reves, the Supreme Court held that “because the Securities Acts define ‘security’ to include ‘any note,’” courts “begin with a presumption that every note is a security. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Ernst & Young, 494 U.S. 56, 63 (1990) when determining that the syndicated loan was not a security. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 3:15 am by John Jenkins
Ernst & Young featured prominently in the Court’s reasoning: In affirming the district court’s decision, the Second Circuit’s analysis focused on the Reves test. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 8:02 am by Doug Cornelius
Ernst & Young 110 S.Ct. 945 919900 To Be or Note to Be a Security: Reve v. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Good morning, Chairman McHenry, Ranking Member Waters, and members of the Committee. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm by Gary Gensler
Joseph Kennedy, the first Chairman of the SEC, had a saying: “No honest business need fear the SEC. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 6:50 am by Mark Astarita
Ernst & Young, set forth the “family resemblance” test to determine whether a note is a security. [read post]