Search for: "Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings"
Results 41 - 57
of 57
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2016, 8:46 am
MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc. 506 A.2d 173 (Del. 1986)). [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 12:26 pm
Revlon, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 8:50 am
MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, where the court stated, The duty of the board had thus changed from the preservation of Revlon as a corporate entity to the maximization of the company’s value at a sale for the stockholders’ benefit. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 11:38 pm
MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc., 506 A.2d 173 (Del. 1986).) [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 7:42 pm
MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc., 506 A. 2d 173 (Del. 1986).36 See Unocal Corp. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 8:46 am
MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc., 506 A.2d 173, 182 (Del. 1986). [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 4:07 pm
., Revlon, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 9:05 am
MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc. [read post]
25 May 2011, 10:39 am
In this Revlon Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc. and Unlocal Petroleum Corp v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 12:35 pm
MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, 506 A.2d 173 (Del. 1986) [see generally here] to maximize stockholder value in a change-in-control transaction. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 4:21 pm
’”). [6] In Revlon, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
A seller choosing to hold an auction must carefully consider what the "rules of the game" will be. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
., Revlon, Inc. v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 8:07 pm
Consider, for example, the proposed sale of Netsmart Technologies, Inc. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:22 am
., returns in excess of that necessary to maintain the asset in its current use.[3] If such quasi-rents are appropriable by the party with control of the transaction specific asset, a hold up problem ensues. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
