Search for: "Reynolds v. United States"
Results 321 - 340
of 621
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2013, 2:40 pm
A few examples make the point: In the case refusing to allow polygamy on the grounds of the Free Exercise Clause, Reynolds v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:34 pm
White-Hat Bias & Black-Hat Ethics I recently came across a disturbing article in the Environmental Health Perspectives, a peer-reviewed journal, supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, United States Department of Health and Human Services. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:43 pm
Slip at 4, citing United States v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 7:30 am
Tamiz v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 11:49 pm
United States, 265F.3d 1371, 1377–79 (Fed. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 1:12 pm
Three days ago, the United States Supreme Court unanimously upheld the federally-backed regime in Cafastan against the latest insurgent assault in Standard Fire Insurance Company v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 8:53 am
In United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 11:00 am
Reynolds, 130 S. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 11:08 am
United States, 247 U. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 7:14 pm
Without embracing the equation made in Reynolds v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 2:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 1:25 pm
To understand why the federal guidelines for drug offenses need to be revised, read Judge Gleeson’s full opinion in United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 5:19 pm
The defendants had solicited and pooled public funds with the stated intention of investing approximately 97% of the proceeds in United States Treasury bills, and using the remainder to hedge the account by trading futures contracts on Treasury bills. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 5:19 pm
The defendants had solicited and pooled public funds with the stated intention of investing approximately 97% of the proceeds in United States Treasury bills, and using the remainder to hedge the account by trading futures contracts on Treasury bills. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:25 am
The House of Lords in Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd [2001] 2 AC 127 explained why English law should adopt a different approach. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
14 Oct 2012, 6:04 pm
Reynolds v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 1:08 pm
Case number: 11-cv-1271 (United States District Court for the District of Columbia) Case filed: July 13, 2011 Qualifying Judgment/Order: July 23, 2012 09/04/2012 12/03/2012 2012-83 SEC v. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 2:15 pm
First, in Reynolds v. [read post]
