Search for: "Rhode Island v. Massachusetts"
Results 241 - 260
of 458
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2014, 1:50 pm
The First Circuit has not yet had a same-sex marriage appeal before it, in the current round of cases, because such marriages already have been allowed in all of the mainland U.S. states that are in that region — Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Rhode Island. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:19 am
Last week, the states of New York, State of Connecticut, State of Delaware, State of Maine, State of New Mexico, State of Oregon, State of Rhode Island, State of Vermont, State of Washington, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, District of Columbia filed notice of their intention to participate as amicus curiae In June, Alabama, Kentucky, Oklahoma, South Carolina, West Virginia, Alaska, Nebraska, Ohio and Wyoming also filed an amicus brief… [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:19 am
Last week, the states of New York, State of Connecticut, State of Delaware, State of Maine, State of New Mexico, State of Oregon, State of Rhode Island, State of Vermont, State of Washington, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, District of Columbia filed notice of their intention to participate as amicus curiae In June, Alabama, Kentucky, Oklahoma, South Carolina, West Virginia, Alaska, Nebraska, Ohio and Wyoming also filed an amicus brief… [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 8:39 am
Los Circuitos son distritos que recogen los tribunales federales de un grupo de estados, en el caso nuestro compartimos el circuito con Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts y Rhode Island. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 7:21 pm
Such marriages are legal in the four states in that circuit: Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Rhode Island. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
Massachusetts is one of the several states that bans stun guns (including Tasers) — the others are Hawaii, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, and Wisconsin, plus the Annapolis/Baltimore area in Maryland, New Orleans, Washington, D.C., and several other cities. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 11:16 am
On July 5, 2014, New York became the twenty-first state along with the District of Columbia to legalize marijuana use for certain medical conditions—joining Alaska, Arizona, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, and Vermont. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 7:58 am
Rhode Island’s Only 24 Hour Truck & Auto Plaza, Inc., 962 F.Supp.2d 311 (D. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 8:19 am
On June 16, 2014, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Elonis v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 4:23 am
§ 875(c) requires proof of the defendant’s subjective intent to threaten, as required by the Ninth Circuit and the supreme courts of Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Vermont; or whether it is enough to show that a “reasonable person” would regard the statement as threatening, as held by other federal courts of appeals and state courts of last resort.The Virginia v Black case held that a Virginia statute that outlawed cross-burning was… [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 8:28 am
Black [opinion], ... conviction of threatening another person requires proof of the defendant's subjective intent to threaten, as required by the Ninth Circuit and the supreme courts of Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Vermont; or whether it is enough to show that... [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:43 am
§ 875(c) requires proof of the defendant's subjective intent to threaten, as required by the Ninth Circuit and the supreme courts of Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Vermont; or whether it is enough to show that a “reasonable person” would regard the statement as threatening, as held by other federal courts of appeals and state courts of last resort. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:00 am
§ 875(c) requires proof of the defendant's subjective intent to threaten, as required by the Ninth Circuit and the supreme courts of Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Vermont; or whether it is enough to show that a “reasonable person” would regard the statement as threatening, as held by other federal courts of appeals and state courts of last resort. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 7:09 am
§ 875(c) requires proof of the defendant's subjective intent to threaten, as required by the Ninth Circuit and the supreme courts of Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Vermont; or whether it is enough to show that a “reasonable person” would regard the statement as threatening, as held by other federal courts of appeals and state courts of last resort. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:15 am
§ 875(c) requires proof of the defendant's subjective intent to threaten, as required by the Ninth Circuit and the supreme courts of Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Vermont; or whether it is enough to show that a “reasonable person” would regard the statement as threatening, as held by other federal courts of appeals and state courts of last resort. [read post]
30 May 2014, 6:31 am
Massachusetts, 13-9930. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:45 pm
§ 875(c) requires proof of the defendant's subjective intent to threaten, as required by the Ninth Circuit and the supreme courts of Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Vermont; or whether it is enough to show that a “reasonable person” would regard the statement as threatening, as held by other federal courts of appeals and state courts of last resort. [read post]
26 May 2014, 9:01 pm
States like New York and Rhode Island, which had never taken a position, also adopted laws to allow same-sex marriage. [read post]
19 May 2014, 7:45 pm
§ 875(c) requires proof of the defendant's subjective intent to threaten, as required by the Ninth Circuit and the supreme courts of Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Vermont; or whether it is enough to show that a “reasonable person” would regard the statement as threatening, as held by other federal courts of appeals and state courts of last resort. [read post]
16 May 2014, 7:14 pm
§ 875(c) requires proof of the defendant’s subjective intent to threaten, as required by the Ninth Circuit and the supreme courts of Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Vermont; or whether it is enough to show that a “reasonable person” would regard the statement as threatening, as held by other federal courts of appeals and state courts of last resort. [read post]
