Search for: "Rhode Island v. Massachusetts" Results 281 - 300 of 458
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2010, 10:42 am by Eugene Volokh
Rhode Island lacked a state Constitution and a corresponding Bill of Rights until 1842; Justice Story must have been treating the common law of tort as being limited by the common law of freedom of speech and of the press.] [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 2:15 pm by ALeonard
In another example, Gansler pointed out that Rhode Island permits marriages between an uncle and a niece, which are not authorized in Maryland, but if an uncle and niece were married in Rhode Island and their marital status became an issue in Maryland, it would be recognized there. [read post]
The District Court’s order stated only that Plaintiffs’ “state law subclasses are for Pennsylvania, Connecticut, New York, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Illinois, Michigan, New Hampshire, North Carolina, and Ohio,” without defining the scope of those subclasses. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 7:09 am by John Elwood
§ 875(c) requires proof of the defendant's subjective intent to threaten, as required by the Ninth Circuit and the supreme courts of Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Vermont; or whether it is enough to show that a “reasonable person” would regard the statement as threatening, as held by other federal courts of appeals and state courts of last resort. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
Md. 1975), aff'd, 567 F.2d 269 (4th Cir. 1977).Massachusetts: Vassallo v. [read post]
A recent decision by the U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals (the federal appeals court with jurisdiction in Massachusetts, Maine, New Hampshire, and Rhode Island) provides some important new guidance on the questions but also leaves some matters unanswered. [read post]
A recent decision by the U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals (the federal appeals court with jurisdiction in Massachusetts, Maine, New Hampshire, and Rhode Island) provides some important new guidance on the questions but also leaves some matters unanswered. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
  According to a Supreme Court case we read (which we didn’t bother to verify), those states are:  Connecticut, Louisiana, Michigan, Massachusetts, Nebraska, New Hampshire, and Washington. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:06 pm
Hardman, No. 08-1342 Absent any allegation that state officials were used to enforce the process, Defendant was not transformed into a state actor for section 1983 purposes when he issued a subpoena commanding the Plaintiff to appear at a pretrial deposition, even though the subpoena was issued in his capacity as a notary public and in the name of the state of Rhode Island. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Rhode Island similarly operated under its 1663 Royal Charter until it adopted a constitution in 1842. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 8:41 am by Robert Scavone Jr.
  Decisions by the First Circuit are binding in Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Puerto Rico, and Rhode Island. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:45 pm by Maureen Johnston
§ 875(c) requires proof of the defendant's subjective intent to threaten, as required by the Ninth Circuit and the supreme courts of Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Vermont; or whether it is enough to show that a “reasonable person” would regard the statement as threatening, as held by other federal courts of appeals and state courts of last resort. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 7:34 am by Joy Waltemath
The two amicus briefs were filed by 17 attorneys general, including New York, Virginia, Maryland, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, and the District of Columbia. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 12:01 pm by Dan Gauss
  Police seizure of text messages violated 4th Amendment, judge rules [Ars Technica – Jon Brodkin] Savage's decision in State of Rhode Island v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 12:22 pm by Brenda Fulmer
Under current law, as confirmed by the United States Supreme Court in the Pliva v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 3:00 pm by Lyle Denniston
— that permit such marriages: Connecticut, Delaware, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 3:59 am by Randy Barnett
If you remove just seven of the least populous blue states (Vermont, Delaware, Rhode Island, Hawaii, Massachusetts, New Mexico and Connecticut) and add Florida and Texas to reach two-thirds, you are well over one-half of the national population, and still with a mix of red and blue states from throughout the country.Realistically, repeal will only happen when the 535 persons comprising Congress plus the president are grossly out of step with public opinion, or when… [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 11:16 am by Epstein Becker Green
  On July 5, 2014, New York became the twenty-first state along with the District of Columbia to legalize marijuana use for certain medical conditions—joining Alaska, Arizona, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, and Vermont. [read post]