Search for: "Rhodes v. Stewart" Results 21 - 40 of 43
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2022, 9:47 am by Katherine Pompilio
Jon Lewis and Seamus Hughes discussed what the prosecution of Stewart Rhodes might mean for the future of the Oath Keepers and the broader anti-government movement. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:14 pm by Katherine Pompilio
Stewart Rhodes was indicted and arrested after a federal grand jury introduced a new set of charges against a small group of Oath Keepers. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
 Stewarts Law has published a Litigator’s Guide to Subject Access Requests. [read post]
24 May 2015, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts As already mentioned, on Wednesday 20 May 2015, the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the case of OPO v James Rhodes ([2015] UKSC 32). [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
The beginnings and development of copyright and the First Amendment are still under-observed: Eldred v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:38 pm by Kiera Flynn
(forthcoming)   Stewart & Jasper Orchards v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 2:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 "Where an individual claim of breach of contract arises out of the same facts as an asserted legal malpractice cause of action and does not allege distinct damages, the breach of contract claim is duplicative of the malpractice claim (see Turner v Irving Finkelstein & [*2]Meirowitz, LLP, 61 AD3d 849, 850 [2009]; Garten v Shearman & Sterling LLP, 52 AD3d 207, 207-208 [2008]; Peak v Bartlett, Pontiff, Stewart & Rhodes, P.C., 28 AD3d… [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
  As we mentioned earlier in the week, Rhode Island has now fallen. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 2:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
However, even if a plaintiff establishes the first prong, the plaintiff must still demonstrate that he or she would have succeeded on the merits of the action but for the attorney's negligence (see Hamoudeh v Mandel, 62 AD3d 948, 949; McCluskey v Gabor & Gabor, 61 AD3d 646, 648; Peak v Bartlett, Pontiff, Stewart & Rhodes, P.C., 28 AD3d 1028, 1030-31; see also Brodeur v Hayes, 18 AD3d 979; Raphael v Clune, White & Nelson,… [read post]
16 May 2008, 12:43 pm
As a result of that, and some litigation in the Massachusetts state courts, it seems that the only U.S. residents who have been allowed to marry in Massachusetts are Rhode Islanders (based on a possibly dubious interpretation of Rhode Island law by the Massachusetts courts) and a few New Yorkers who rushed in to marry in 2004 before state government threats to local clerks shut down that process. [read post]