Search for: "Rice v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 1,001
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2023, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Liberties Union v New York City Police Dept., 32 NY3d 556). ** See Chapter 96 of the Laws of 2020. *** There are statutory prohibitions to public disclosure of certain public records. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Liberties Union v New York City Police Dept., 32 NY3d 556). ** See Chapter 96 of the Laws of 2020. *** There are statutory prohibitions to public disclosure of certain public records. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 1:00 pm by Dykema
On September 29, 2016, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in the matter of Expressions Hair Design et al. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 4:28 am
He successfully argued on behalf of the Sac and Fox Nation in the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Oklahoma Tax Commission v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 3:14 pm
Today the General Court held otherwise after a successful appeal by Tilda from the Board of Appeal decision: Tilda Riceland Private Ltd v OHIM (T304/09). [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 10:08 am by Guest Blogger
  In response, the State of Wyoming argued—as it had successfully below—that the dispute was squarely governed by the Court’s decision in Ward v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 4:07 pm
Dow Agrosciences, Justice Stevens managed to get a majority to resurrect the Rice v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 4:25 pm
"The report was sent to Congress as required by Sec. 102(b) of the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998.UPDATE: The remarks of Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and the remarks and lengthy Q&A of Ambassador at Large for International Religious Freedom John V. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 11:23 am by Native American Rights Fund
Creek Casino Montgomery (Civil Procedure)State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2017.html Rice v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 11:32 am by John McFarland
This week, the Texas Supreme Court denied Denbury Green Pipeline's motion for rehearing in Texas Rice Land Partners v. [read post]