Search for: "Rich Schragger"
Results 1 - 20
of 20
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2014, 7:50 am
Galloway decision and the "geography of church and state" (TM), I wrote to express my hope that Rich Schragger of UVa would say something about these issues. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Rich Schragger responds to Jack Balkin: Because Jack was so kind as to respond to my prior post, I thought I'd pile on once more. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:00 am
This week and next at Balkinization we are hosting a symposium on Helen Norton's new book, The Government's Speech and the Constitution (Cambridge University Press, 2019).We have assembled a terrific group of commentators, including Corey Brettschneider (Brown), Josh Chafetz (Cornell), Caroline Mala Corbin (Miami), Nathan Cortez (SMU), Mark Graber (Maryland), Fred Schauer (Virginia), Rich Schragger (Virginia), Nelson Tebbe (Cornell), and Sonja R West" (Georgia).At… [read post]
8 May 2008, 8:08 pm
This week, Rich Schragger and I have been debating my forthcoming piece, Homeownership 2.0. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 7:20 am
Rich SchraggerBecause Jack was so kind as to respond to my prior post, I thought I'd pile on once more. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 6:30 am
There are elements of those ideas in Schragger’s book. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 5:00 am
Micah Schwartzman, Rich Schragger, and Nelson TebbeWe wanted to post a couple updates to the Establishment Clause argument against granting an exemption under RFRA to the so-called “contraception mandate” – which may be a misnomer (as Marty Lederman has argued). [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 12:21 pm
[I'm posting this for Rich Schragger, who ran into technical difficulty putting it up. - NT] Rich SchraggerOver at Slate, I point out what should be obvious: that replacing elected city officials with appointed city mangers unaccountable to the local electorate is not just undemocratic, it is also bad policy. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 6:00 am
These questions lie at the heart of Rich Schragger’s intriguing and powerful (pun intended!) [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 10:32 am
He then presented, and reflected briefly on, the criticisms of "religious institutionalism" that have been developed by Micah Schwartzman and Rich Schragger (in this paper). [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Rich Schragger of UVA School of Law will debate Lee's paper next week on the Faculty Blog. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
Others have, too (and better), and this latest paper is an effort to respond, at least in part, to some of the important questions and challenges that have been raised, especially by Rich Schragger and Micah Schwartzman. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 4:40 pm
As Rich Schragger points out, this type of legislation, among its many defects, overrides the ability of municipalities to reach their own resolutions for a given issue. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 1:30 pm
”Rich Schragger also bemoans this trend, in particular the Court’s rejection of expressive meaning as the key to understanding when the government’s choices violate the Establishment Clause or Equal Protection Clause. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 3:56 pm
When Airbnb collects data on guests or Uber – on GPS location, rich troves of information are produced. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 7:28 pm
Meanwhile, here at Balkinization, we’ve already published several important posts—this one by Joey Fishkin, and a series of three posts on the Establishment Clause questions raised in the case—here, hereand here—co-authored by Micah Schwartzman, Rich Schragger and Nelson Tebbe. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 5:55 am
” Micah Schwartzman, Rich Schragger, and Nelson Tebbe also have a post on Slate making a similar criticism. [read post]
7 May 2014, 8:36 pm
") 6) On a more direct note, I hope that one of the people writing about these kinds of questions will be Rich Schragger of UVa. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 10:03 pm
Micah Schwartzman, Richard Schragger, and Nelson Tebbe began an important conversation with their post on this blog about the contraceptive mandate and the Establishment Clause. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 1:08 pm
In earlier posts, such as this one, I noted that in the context of commercial activities, the Supreme Court—and virtually every other court, for that matter—has consistently construed the Free Exercise Clause and religious accommodation statutes not to require religious exemptions from generally applicable regulations, from at least 1944 until this week. [read post]
