Search for: "Richard Bagley" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2018, 5:46 pm by Howard Bashman
“To Save Obamacare, Repeal the Mandate; Giving Republicans a symbolic victory could allow Democrats to preserve the ACA”: Law professors Nicholas Bagley and Richard Primus have this essay online at The Atlantic. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 9:53 am
"Trump administration reversing Obamacare's birth control mandate": Richard Wolf of USA Today has this report. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  ICYMI: Richard Lazarus’s Rule of Five, on Massachusetts v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 4:56 am by Amy Howe
” At The Incidental Economist, Nicholas Bagley discusses M&G Polymers USA v. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 1:44 pm
However, taped transcripts of phone conversations with Chief Deputy Attorney General Kirk Torgensen and Deputy Attorney General Richard Hamp revealed Byrne's scheme with Shurtleff to defame and discredit me (Details here).Judd Bagley posts innuendo, smears, and lies about my divorce in an effort to discredit meMost recently, I have been embroiled in a divorce with my former spouse. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 3:30 am by Amy Howe
  Briefly: At The Incidental Economist, Nicholas Bagley discusses the Court’s recent opinion in Armstrong v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 5:58 am by Amy Howe
” At Notice and Comment, Nicholas Bagley looks back at last month’s oral argument in Gobeille v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 11:34 pm by Sam E. Antar
Instead of properly complying with GAAP, Overstock.com CEO Patrick Byrne defamed me in various quarterly conference calls with analysts and investors, sent his paid internet stalker Judd Bagley to interfere in my divorce proceedings, and even had Bagley and spy on my family and other company critics (including our minor family members) using a fake Facebook name. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 5:01 am by Amy Howe
  At The Incidental Economist, Nicholas Bagley contends that several of the Court’s decisions “require Congress to speak with much greater clarity before the courts will impute to it the desire to behave so disrespectfully toward the states. [read post]
26 Nov 2006, 8:24 am
Bagley, Partner Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy LLP2. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 2:45 am by Amy Howe
  Ronald Mann previewed the case for this blog, while in The New England Journal of Medicine Nicholas Bagley and Christopher Koller argue that the case “threatens to cripple these databases and other state initiatives that aim to improve the health care system. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 3:36 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: At PrawfsBlawg, Richard Re weighs in on last week’s decision in Yates v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 3:14 am by Amy Howe
  Other coverage comes from Nina Totenberg of NPR, Mark Walsh at Education Week’s The School Law Blog, Adam Liptak of The New York Times, Richard Wolf of USA Today, and Voice of America News. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 4:00 am by Amy Howe
”  At The Incidental Economist, Nicholas Bagley considers the decision and why the ACA “require[s] employers to cover birth control for women in the first place,” and at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog Steven Schwinn and Ruthann Robson discuss a possible response by Congress to the decision. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 6:47 am by Amy Howe
” Nicholas Bagley weighs in on the standing issue at The Incidental Economist, expressing “serious doubts about the standing of” three of the four challengers. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:07 am by Amy Howe
At The Incidental Economist, Nicholas Bagley weighs in on King v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 3:12 am by Amy Howe
Escobar, in which the Court ruled on the circumstances in which the implied false certification theory can be a basis for liability under the False Claims Act, comes from Joan Krause, who at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights suggests that, although “both parties quickly claimed victory, in reality the decision is likely to satisfy no one and to raise as many questions as it answers”; Richard Samp, who at the Washington Legal Foundation’s Legal Pulse concludes that,… [read post]