Search for: "Richard A. Epstein"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,509
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2012, 7:42 am
Roger Runningen and Hans Nichols of Bloomberg report on the story, as do Mark Landler of the New York Times, Richard Wolf and David Jackson of USA Today, Laura Meckler and Carol E. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:13 am
RICHARD EPSTEIN: Justice Kennedy’s Million-Dollar Question. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 9:19 pm
Conspicuously absent was any mention of Richard Epstein’s theories, even though Epstein was one of the most cited law professors in the country, and had published just a few years earlier a widely-discussed book on the subject. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 8:02 am
(Todd Zywicki) at the Liberty Law blog. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 7:07 am
Landes of the University of Chicago and Judge Richard A. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 7:00 am
The latter include such prominent constitutional law scholars as Richard Epstein, Steve Calabresi, Steve Presser, and Gary Lawson.” UPDATE: Reader Michael Formica writes: Is it really the case, as the Atlantic claims, that Volokh actually changed perceptions? [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:03 pm
The latter include such prominent constitutional law scholars as Richard Epstein, Steve Calabresi, Steve Presser, and Gary Lawson. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 3:04 pm
To discuss the coercion issue, we have Richard Epstein, professor at New York University School of Law and professor emeritus at the University of Chicago Law School, and Michael Greve, who is the John G. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 7:29 am
RICHARD EPSTEIN: ObamaCare: An Unconstitutional Misadventure. “In this column, I will show how fatal defects in Obamacare’s structure undermine the constitutional case for key provisions found in Title I of the law (‘Quality, Affordable Health Care for All Americans’), which regulates the private insurance market.” [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 11:20 am
It’s also worth noting that many leading constitutional federalism scholars believe that the law is unconstitutional, including Gary Lawson (one of the top experts on the Necessary and Proper Clause), Steve Calabresi (who is one of the legal scholars who signed on to the amicus brief I wrote for the Washington Legal Foundation), Richard Epstein, and, of course, co-blogger Randy Barnett. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 12:15 pm
Epstein, the Laurence A. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 3:20 am
She argues that: the Supreme Court and some scholars, including Professor Richard Epstein, have justified the new standard on the basis of the costs in Twombly, an “oddball” case—with massive costs and significant asymmetry of costs—and have not shown that the new standard should apply transsubstantively to cases that do not have such costs, including typical employment discrimination cases. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:23 am
The Federalist Society posted a podcast about the case with Professor Richard Epstein, available here. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 9:04 am
RICHARD EPSTEIN: City Planners Run Amok. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 3:32 pm
If you run ends and means together in this way, you effectively read the Necessary and Proper Clause out of the Constitution and invalidate quite a lot of what the federal government now routinely does.Now, it has been clear for some time that the most articulate opponents of the mandate (who include such formidable intellects as Richard Epstein, Randy Barnett, and Gary Lawson) have just this in mind. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 4:13 pm
UPDATE: Richard Epstein commented on the case here, and George Will in this column. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 9:23 am
One academic favored by the right wing, Richard Epstein, arrogantly refers to the constitutional right to a civil jury trial as a “procedural feature. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 1:00 am
The more exceptions we make for people the less we obey the rule of law, which Richard Epstein describes as, “the free and fair application of general principles without bias or exception. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 9:44 am
RICHARD EPSTEIN: Is Women’s Empowerment A Bureaucratic Imperative? [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 3:39 am
Merrill Lynch; Trask; Karlsgodt; Seyfarth Shaw; Baker Hostetler; WSJ Law Blog; earlier at POL] Richard Epstein on safety nets: "These can cushion... [read post]
