Search for: "Richard Bagley"
Results 1 - 20
of 47
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm
I’d like to thank members of the SEC staff for their work on these final rules, including: Mellissa Duru, Luna Bloom, Elliot Staffin, Kristin Baldwin, Valian Afshar, Almaze Semere, Dennis Hermreck, Nolan McWilliams, Grace Baer, Lindsay McCord, Ethan Horowitz, Robert Errett, Deegi Biteng, Adam Turk, Ted Yu, Liz Walsh, Duc Dang, Brad Skinner, Mike Reedich, Kat Bagley, Cheryl Brown, Jeb Byrne, Nabeel Cheema, John Fieldsend, Jason Weidberg, Michael Coco, Angie Kim, Charli Gibbs-Tabler,… [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 9:03 pm
I’d like to thank members of the SEC staff for their work on these final rules, including: Erik Gerding, Mellissa Duru, Ted Yu, Nicholas Panos, Valian Afshar, Elizabeth Murphy, Robert Errett, Chris Windsor, Anne Krauskopf, Katherine Bagley, Emma O’Hara, and Pearl Crawley in the Division of Corporation Finance; Megan Barbero, Bryant Morris, Dorothy McCuaig, Ken Alcé, David Russo, Rachel McKenzie, and Brooke Wagner in the Office of the General Counsel; Jessica Wachter,… [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:46 am
Jonathan Barnett (USC); Richard Epstein (NYU/UChicago); Jay Kesan (Illinois); Adam Mossoff (George Mason); and Kristen Osenga (Richmond). [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 3:03 pm
Already posted are Jeff Pojanowski's introduction, and contributions from Ronald Levin, Kevin Stack, Mila Sohoni, Nicholas Bagley, Emily Bremer and Jennifer Mascott. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 3:22 pm
Trump Needs Three Consecutive Hail Mary Passes By Richard L. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 9:30 pm
ICYMI: Richard Lazarus’s Rule of Five, on Massachusetts v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 3:50 am
” At Morning Consult, Richard Hunt argues that in Seila Law v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:24 pm
There’s something for everyone: abortion restrictions, the Lanham Act, jurisdiction over foreign states, antidiscrimination law, ERISA, a surprisingly basic Armed Career Criminal Act question and even something called the “Bob Richards” rule. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 5:46 pm
“To Save Obamacare, Repeal the Mandate; Giving Republicans a symbolic victory could allow Democrats to preserve the ACA”: Law professors Nicholas Bagley and Richard Primus have this essay online at The Atlantic. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 9:53 am
"Trump administration reversing Obamacare's birth control mandate": Richard Wolf of USA Today has this report. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 3:12 am
Escobar, in which the Court ruled on the circumstances in which the implied false certification theory can be a basis for liability under the False Claims Act, comes from Joan Krause, who at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights suggests that, although “both parties quickly claimed victory, in reality the decision is likely to satisfy no one and to raise as many questions as it answers”; Richard Samp, who at the Washington Legal Foundation’s Legal Pulse concludes that,… [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 5:58 am
” At Notice and Comment, Nicholas Bagley looks back at last month’s oral argument in Gobeille v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 2:45 am
Ronald Mann previewed the case for this blog, while in The New England Journal of Medicine Nicholas Bagley and Christopher Koller argue that the case “threatens to cripple these databases and other state initiatives that aim to improve the health care system. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:31 am
At The Incidental Economist, Nicholas Bagley discusses the possibility that the Court “tipped its hand” in King v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 3:30 am
Briefly: At The Incidental Economist, Nicholas Bagley discusses the Court’s recent opinion in Armstrong v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 3:36 am
Briefly: At PrawfsBlawg, Richard Re weighs in on last week’s decision in Yates v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 6:47 am
” Nicholas Bagley weighs in on the standing issue at The Incidental Economist, expressing “serious doubts about the standing of” three of the four challengers. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 5:01 am
At The Incidental Economist, Nicholas Bagley contends that several of the Court’s decisions “require Congress to speak with much greater clarity before the courts will impute to it the desire to behave so disrespectfully toward the states. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:07 am
At The Incidental Economist, Nicholas Bagley weighs in on King v. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 8:53 am
· Richard L. [read post]
