Search for: "Richard J Clark" Results 1 - 20 of 375
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:49 am by Nathan Dorn
The subject of judicial ordeals has come up a number of times on this blog, most recently in a post about Jean Bodin’s sixteenth century handbook on witch-hunting. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am by INFORRM
On 1 November, J Johnson handed down judgement of preliminary issues in the case of Clarke v Guardian [2023] EWHC 2734 (KB). [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
On August 14, 2023, a Fulton County, Georgia grand jury returned a 41-count indictment against former President Donald Trump and eighteen other individuals for a conspiracy to overturn the legitimate 2020 presidential election results in that state. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 7:55 am by Elizabeth Goitein
Editor’s Note: This is part of a multi-part series on the FISA Section 702 reauthorization and reform debate. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, Fancourt J heard two applications in Duke of Sussex v NGN. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
In Hanahoe (much as in Richard v BBC) the Gardaí leaked to the media that they would carry out a search at the offices of a prominent firm of solicitors. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 11:58 am by Avery Schmitz
Lindsay, associate professor at the Georgia Institute of Technology; and Richard J. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am by INFORRM
Osborne Clarke and Bristows published articles summarising the guidance. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am by INFORRM
In addition to the damages, which the judge, Richard Spearman KC, said would be higher if not for the cap, the court also granted a permanent injunction to prevent the defendant from repeating the allegations. [read post]