Search for: "Richard Oppenheim"
Results 81 - 100
of 104
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2009, 12:20 pm
Chao, 463 F.Supp.2d 184, 190-91 (D.Conn.2006); Oppenheimer Mendez v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 2:25 am
And I will say that when the judgment day comes, my guess is that a million Matthew Oppenheims, and a million Richard Gabriels, and a million Timothy Reynolds', won't be worth a single Tanya Andersen. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 12:52 am
If you have questions related to an employment lawsuit (filed or not), contact Richard Oppenheim. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 10:42 pm
If you have questions related to Contract Litigation, Employment Litigation or any other aspect of Business Litigation, please call Richard Oppenheim at 818-461-8500. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 9:07 pm
If you have questions regarding any aspect of employment law, including any form of discrimination, contact Richard Oppenheim at 818-461-8500. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 11:03 pm
If you have questions related to employment law issues, please contact Richard Oppenheim at 818-461-8500. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 4:53 am
Amurao, Rolando Amurao has fought back, filing papers (a) in further support of his motion to exclude the MediaSentry evidence for having been procured illegally and to compel the deposition of Matthew Oppenheim, and (b) in opposition to the RIAA's motions for voluntary dismissal, for summary judgment on the copyright misuse counterclaim, and for discovery sanctions.Defendant's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to RIAA's 3 motions*Declaration of Richard A. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 10:05 am
Oppenheimer & Co. analyst Meredith Whitney estimated last month that the investment banks might have to record additional writedowns of $70 billion if the bond insurers fail. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 10:32 am
If you have questions about filing a Real Estate lawsuit, or have had a lawsuit filed against, contact attorney Richard Oppenheim at 818-461-8500. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 9:17 am
(If you find any inconsistencies among these, please don't complain to me; complain to Richard Gabriel and Matthew Oppenheim, the architects of the house of lies).It is important to the practitioner to be able to access a collection of the RIAA's prior pronouncements on MediaSentry, because the RIAA's lawyers will say just about anything, and often will contradict what they say in one context, in another context (sometimes even in the same document).So the astute… [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 9:24 pm
If you have any questions about this or any other employment law issue, feel free to contact Richard Oppenheim. [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 7:05 pm
- Richard Oppenheim [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 5:31 pm
If you are unsure how to proceed with a claim which might lead to a lawsuit, contact Richard Oppenheim today. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 10:20 am
Once Defendant converted Plaintiffs' recordings into the compressed .mp3 format and they are in his shared folder, they are no longer the authorized copies....I believe one lawyer wrote the italicized portion, and then his or her supervisor -- probably Richard Gabriel or Matthew Oppenheim -- added the underlined portion, in order to fudge the issue and make the passage sound more palatable.The judge had asked whether the copies were themselves unauthorized. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 10:24 am
Oppenheim every day gives Richard Gabriel his marching orders; who is giving Oppenheim his marching orders? [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 10:08 am
Richard Oppenheim PS Additional helpful information may be found in questions 5 and 6 in our resource document "Eleven Questions to Ask BEFORE Hiring a Business Attorney". [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 12:33 pm
Richard Oppenheim 818-461-8500 [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 12:59 am
The Budapest operation, which will take the name of Oppenheim, will become an independent practice in the region starting Nov. 1, due to a desire by the Hungarian lawyers to undertake more local work. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 8:07 am
"But the Judge this morning, accepting Richard Gabriel's argument, changed it:Gabriel cited Perfect 10 v. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 3:54 am
"But the Judge this morning, accepting Richard Gabriel's argument, changed it:Gabriel cited Perfect 10 v. [read post]
