Search for: "Richard Pildes"
Results 41 - 60
of 183
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2020, 11:04 am
As stated in this article by Richard Pildes, Professor of Constitutional Law, New York University - the Constitution does not create rules or an institutional structure for resolving a modern, disputed presidential election. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 9:55 am
The panel will feature professors Rebecca Green of William & Mary, Richard Hasen of UC Irvine, Lisa Manheim of the University of Washington, Derek Muller of the University of Iowa, Nathaniel Persily of Stanford, Richard Pildes of NYU, Charles Stewart III of MIT and Franita Tolson of the University of Southern California. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 7:42 am
At the Election Law Blog, Richard Pildes analyzes the “Purcell” doctrine in election litigation, writing that the doctrine is “not a principle of substantive, federal constitutional law,” which means that “it does not apply to state courts addressing election-law claim. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 6:51 pm
Pildes and G. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 5:56 pm
“The Supreme Court’s Wisconsin Decision and the Universal Policy that Absentee Ballots Must be Cast (Postmarked) On or Before Election Day”: Richard Pildes has this post at the “Election Law Blog. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 8:06 am
Richard Pildes argued that COVID-19 could generate an enormous shift toward voting by mail in the 2020 general election—magnifying the possibility of election meltdown if the apparent “winner” on election night turns out to have lost a week or more later. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 1:54 pm
” Law professor Richard Pildes has this essay online at The Washington Post. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 6:40 pm
“Small Donors and Political Polarization”: Richard Pildes has this post at the “Election Law Blog” about his essay titled “Small-Donor-Based Campaign-Finance Reform and Political Polarization,” which was recently published at The Yale Law Journal Forum. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 1:14 pm
The discussion will feature Roman Martinez of Latham & Watkins, NYU Law’s Richard Pildes and Amy Howe of “Howe on the Court,” moderated by NYU Law’s Deborah Malamud. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 4:21 am
” At Balkinization, Rick Pildes describes the decision as “a powerful example of what I call an ‘institutionally realist’ approach to judicial review of executive branch action. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 7:30 am
(Obviously, this calls into deeper question the continuing relevance of Madison, especially in light of the critique offered several years ago by Richard Pildes and Darryl Levinson of Madison in terms of "separation of parties" rather than of "powers. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:11 am
First-rate scholars have argued a range of failures, including Richard Pildes’s contention that Mueller abdicated a “core responsibility” in declining to reach a judgment on obstruction of justice and Jack Goldsmith’s argument that the Mueller report misapplied the law governing a president’s exposure to liability for obstruction.. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
Richard L. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 3:54 am
” At the Election Law Blog, Richard Pildes notes that “several Justices raised questions about whether partisan-gerrymandering challenges implicitly appeal in one way or another to a baseline of proportional representation (PR),” but he points out that “political scientists have long understood that a system of single-member districting, such as we use for Congress, should not be expected to produce PR. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 4:10 am
” At the Election Law Blog, Richard Pildes notes that “several Justices raised questions about whether partisan-gerrymandering challenges implicitly appeal in one way or another to a baseline of proportional representation (PR),” but Pildes points out that “political scientists have long understood that a system of single-member districting, such as we use for Congress, should not be expected to produce PR. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:16 am
Richard H. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:56 am
Richard H. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 7:42 am
” And at the “Lawfare” blog, Richard H. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 6:48 pm
As Professor Richard Pildes explained in a New York Times op-ed yesterday, “The court’s rejection of statewide challenges in the Wisconsin case will make gerrymandering litigation more complex. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 4:10 am
” Additional commentary and analysis come from Justin Levitt in an op-ed for The Washington Post, Richard Pildes in an op-ed for The New York Times, Mark Joseph Stern at Slate, Vann Newkirk at The Atlantic, Eric Segal in an op-ed for NBC News, Galen Druke at FiveThirtyEight, Carolyn Shapiro in an op-ed at The Hill, Thomas Mann at Brookings, Medium’s Flippable blog, Jeffrey Toobin at The New Yorker, and Walter Olson at the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, who… [read post]
