Search for: "Richard Pildes" Results 101 - 120 of 176
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2009, 2:29 am
The term will provide important hints, said Richard H. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:55 am by Rick Hasen
. | Montana Panel Panelists Professor Bill Marshall (UNC) | Professor Richard Pildes (NYU) Professor Richard Hasen (UC Irvine) | Professor Edward Foley (OSU) Professor Michael Kang (Emory) | Professor Ciara Torres-Spelliscy (Stetson) Professor James Lopach (Montana) | Professor Jeff Wiltse (Montana) Professor Robert Swartout (Carroll) | Allison Hayward (Center for Competitive Politics) Edwin Bender (Institute on Money in State Politics) | Andy Huff (MT Asst. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 2:26 pm by Andrew Hamm
Commentary on the confirmation process more generally comes from Ilya Shapiro for The Federalist, Richard Pildes for Monkey Cage at The Washington Post, Ian Millhiser for Think Progress, and Genevieve Wood for The Daily Signal. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 7:56 pm by Margaret Spicer
Dahm, Konstantin Kakaes, Samuel Issacharoff, Richard Pildes, and Brad Allenby. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 8:26 pm by legalinformatics
Filed under: Conference Announcements, Lectures, Research findings, teleconferences Tagged: California gay marriage debates, California Proposition 8 debates, CARD Calls, Communication About Research and Professional Development, Edward Schiappa, Gay marriage, Legal argument, Legal argumentation, Legal communication, Legal informatics conferences, Legal rhetoric, National Communication Association, NCA, NCA CARD Calls, Policy communication, Political communication, Proposition 8, Rhetorical analysis… [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:39 am by Amy Howe
” At the Fed Soc Blog, Richard Pildes previews Puerto Rico v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 7:40 pm by Kali Borkoski
New 10:40 Justin Levitt, Ilya Shapiro, Rick Hasen, Ellen Katz, Jeffrey Harris and  Richard Pildes have posted commentary as part of our online symposium about the decision. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 2:04 pm by Molly Runkle
Cox for Medium, Brady Zadrozny for The Daily Beast, Rick Pildes for Balkinization, Corey Brettschneider for The New York Times, Paul Kane for The Washington Post, Paul Callan of CNN,  Emily Crockett of Vox, as well as Sean Illing, Steven Ertelt of LifeNews, and Ian Millhiser of ThinkProgress. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 9:30 pm by Kali Borkoski
We are grateful to the following contributors who will weigh in next week on the cases currently in the pipeline and how the Court should or will rule on the challenges to the VRA: Guy-Uriel Charles  – Duke Law Adam Cox – NYU School of Law and Thomas Miles – University of Chicago Law School Luis Fuentes-Rohwer – Indiana Maurer School of Law Richard Hasen – UC Irvine School of Law and Election Law Blog Heather Gerken – Yale Law School Nathaniel… [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 5:58 am by Amy Howe
Also at Balkinization, Rick Pildes weighs in on the federal government’s amicus brief in Puerto Rico v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 6:51 am by Nabiha Syed
  And at Balkinization, Rick Pildes warns that “when Presidents take on the Court, even in the mild form of criticizing the Court’s decisions, Presidents walk a delicate line. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 10:46 am by Benjamin Wittes
” The other panelsts included: Daniel Klaidman, Newsweek/Daily Beast Mark Mazzetti,  The New York Times Ellen Nakashima, The Washington Post Professor Richard Pildes, NYU School of Law [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 4:00 am by Bob Bauer
This measure could supplement Richard Pildes’ proposal that Congress codify the Justice Department’s special counsel regulations. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 7:42 am by James Romoser
At the Election Law Blog, Richard Pildes analyzes the “Purcell” doctrine in election litigation, writing that the doctrine is “not a principle of substantive, federal constitutional law,” which means that “it does not apply to state courts addressing election-law claim. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 4:08 pm
Liptak quotes lawprof Richard Pildes:"It's deeply dangerous for Congress to change the ground rules for individual races based on a judgment about what's fair. [read post]