Search for: "Richard Pildes"
Results 101 - 120
of 188
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2014, 12:02 pm
Those plaintiffs are represented by noted voting rights professor Richard Pildes, among others.) [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 10:46 am
” The other panelsts included: Daniel Klaidman, Newsweek/Daily Beast Mark Mazzetti, The New York Times Ellen Nakashima, The Washington Post Professor Richard Pildes, NYU School of Law [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
As law professors Daryl Levinson and Richard Pildes argued in an important 2006 Harvard Law Review article, during periods of unified government—when one party controls both houses of Congress and the Presidency—our system works very much like a parliamentary one, with the President finding support for his agenda in the legislature, while in times of divided government, separation of powers works all too well, for then a determined opposition can create gridlock.… [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 7:40 pm
New 10:40 Justin Levitt, Ilya Shapiro, Rick Hasen, Ellen Katz, Jeffrey Harris and Richard Pildes have posted commentary as part of our online symposium about the decision. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 9:54 am
Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: Charles Grassley, Chuck Grassley, Jack Lew, John Sexton, Laura Cunningham, Law School Deans, Law Schools, Money, Noel Cunningham, NYU Law School, Pam Martens, Politics, Real Estate, Richard Pildes, Richard Revesz, Rick Pildes, Senator Charles E. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 8:50 pm
Gary Corn (US Army JAG corps), Deputy Associate General Counsel David Delaney (DHS), Professor Peter Raven-Hansen, and Professor Ed Richards. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 2:16 pm
So what does this have to do with Richard Murdock and other denizens of the Mad-dog Right? [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 12:04 pm
This blog’s symposium on the Voting Rights Act continues with contributions from Joshua Thompson, Richard Pildes, and Abigail Thernstrom. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 10:58 am
09.13.12 Guy-Uriel Charles Online VRA symposium: The Voting Rights Act, judicial review, and congressional deference 09.13.12 Adam Cox and Thomas Miles Online VRA symposium: Social science goes to court 09.13.12 Hans von Spakovsky Online VRA symposium: The constitutionality of Section 5 comes to the Supremes again 09.12.12 Abigail Thernstrom Online VRA symposium: The Section 5 guidelines and their substantial federalism costs 09.12.12 Richard Pildes Online VRA symposium:… [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 10:30 am
The following contribution to our online VRA symposium comes from Richard H. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 8:45 am
The following contribution to our VRA symposium comes from Richard L. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 9:30 pm
We are grateful to the following contributors who will weigh in next week on the cases currently in the pipeline and how the Court should or will rule on the challenges to the VRA: Guy-Uriel Charles – Duke Law Adam Cox – NYU School of Law and Thomas Miles – University of Chicago Law School Luis Fuentes-Rohwer – Indiana Maurer School of Law Richard Hasen – UC Irvine School of Law and Election Law Blog Heather Gerken – Yale Law School Nathaniel… [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:55 am
. | Montana Panel Panelists Professor Bill Marshall (UNC) | Professor Richard Pildes (NYU) Professor Richard Hasen (UC Irvine) | Professor Edward Foley (OSU) Professor Michael Kang (Emory) | Professor Ciara Torres-Spelliscy (Stetson) Professor James Lopach (Montana) | Professor Jeff Wiltse (Montana) Professor Robert Swartout (Carroll) | Allison Hayward (Center for Competitive Politics) Edwin Bender (Institute on Money in State Politics) | Andy Huff (MT Asst. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:17 am
A recent article by NYU law professor Richard Pildes suggested that several recent decisions by the United States Supreme Court, most notably Citizens United, fit the “counter-majoritarian” thesis to a tee. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 8:18 am
Richard H. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 6:47 am
Richard H. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
Putting together a list of all law faculty blogs and law faculty bloggers is a surprisingly difficult task. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 7:21 am
Richard Pildes, writing at Election Law Blog, calls upon the Court to clarify the “boundary between legitimate [campaign] contributions and criminal bribes.” The Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 8:59 pm
Richard H. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 9:52 am
, Professor Richard Pildes challenges the conventional account of the showdown, contending not only that the Court won this battle, but also that it seriously weakened Roosevelt’s presidency. [read post]
