Search for: "Richard Pildes" Results 101 - 120 of 185
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2013, 7:40 pm by Kali Borkoski
New 10:40 Justin Levitt, Ilya Shapiro, Rick Hasen, Ellen Katz, Jeffrey Harris and  Richard Pildes have posted commentary as part of our online symposium about the decision. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 9:54 am by Joe Patrice
Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: Charles Grassley, Chuck Grassley, Jack Lew, John Sexton, Laura Cunningham, Law School Deans, Law Schools, Money, Noel Cunningham, NYU Law School, Pam Martens, Politics, Real Estate, Richard Pildes, Richard Revesz, Rick Pildes, Senator Charles E. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 8:50 pm by Robert Chesney
Gary Corn (US Army JAG corps), Deputy Associate General Counsel David Delaney (DHS), Professor Peter Raven-Hansen, and Professor Ed Richards. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 2:16 pm by Sandy Levinson
 So what does this have to do with Richard Murdock and other denizens of the Mad-dog Right? [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 12:04 pm by Cormac Early
This blog’s symposium on the Voting Rights Act continues with contributions from Joshua Thompson, Richard Pildes, and Abigail Thernstrom. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 10:58 am by Rick Hasen
09.13.12 Guy-Uriel Charles Online VRA symposium: The Voting Rights Act, judicial review, and congressional deference 09.13.12 Adam Cox and Thomas Miles Online VRA symposium: Social science goes to court 09.13.12 Hans von Spakovsky Online VRA symposium: The constitutionality of Section 5 comes to the Supremes again 09.12.12 Abigail Thernstrom Online VRA symposium: The Section 5 guidelines and their substantial federalism costs 09.12.12 Richard Pildes Online VRA symposium:… [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 10:30 am by Richard Pildes
The following contribution to our online VRA symposium comes from Richard H. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 9:30 pm by Kali Borkoski
We are grateful to the following contributors who will weigh in next week on the cases currently in the pipeline and how the Court should or will rule on the challenges to the VRA: Guy-Uriel Charles  – Duke Law Adam Cox – NYU School of Law and Thomas Miles – University of Chicago Law School Luis Fuentes-Rohwer – Indiana Maurer School of Law Richard Hasen – UC Irvine School of Law and Election Law Blog Heather Gerken – Yale Law School Nathaniel… [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:55 am by Rick Hasen
. | Montana Panel Panelists Professor Bill Marshall (UNC) | Professor Richard Pildes (NYU) Professor Richard Hasen (UC Irvine) | Professor Edward Foley (OSU) Professor Michael Kang (Emory) | Professor Ciara Torres-Spelliscy (Stetson) Professor James Lopach (Montana) | Professor Jeff Wiltse (Montana) Professor Robert Swartout (Carroll) | Allison Hayward (Center for Competitive Politics) Edwin Bender (Institute on Money in State Politics) | Andy Huff (MT Asst. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:17 am by Sanford Levinson
  A recent article by NYU law professor Richard Pildes suggested that several recent decisions by the United States Supreme Court, most notably Citizens United, fit the “counter-majoritarian” thesis to a tee. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
Putting together a list of all  law faculty blogs and law faculty bloggers is a surprisingly difficult task. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 7:21 am by Rachel Sachs
Richard Pildes, writing at Election Law Blog, calls upon the Court to clarify the “boundary between legitimate [campaign] contributions and criminal bribes.” The Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 9:52 am by Amanda Frost
, Professor Richard Pildes challenges the conventional account of the showdown, contending not only that the Court won this battle, but also that it seriously weakened Roosevelt’s presidency. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 8:51 am by Harvard Law Review
  Volume 125 · April 2012 · Number 6   ARTICLE Inventing the “Traditional Concept” of Sex Discrimination Cary Franklin BOOK REVIEWS Law and the President Richard H. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 7:32 am by Rick Hasen
“’Obama’s not saying he has the right to defy a Congressional statute,’ said Richard H. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 6:51 am by Nabiha Syed
  And at Balkinization, Rick Pildes warns that “when Presidents take on the Court, even in the mild form of criticizing the Court’s decisions, Presidents walk a delicate line. [read post]