Search for: "Richard Pildes"
Results 121 - 140
of 172
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2012, 12:04 pm
This blog’s symposium on the Voting Rights Act continues with contributions from Joshua Thompson, Richard Pildes, and Abigail Thernstrom. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:04 pm
, PrawfsBlawg, Aug. 14, 2011, by Rick Hills Why John Edwards Probably Did Not Commit A Crime, Regardless of His Motives or Those of The Donors, Election Law Blog, June 4, 2011, by Richard Pildes Legal Theory Lexicon: Legal Theory, Jurisprudence, and the Philosophy of Law, Legal Theory Blog, Apr. 24, 2011, by Lawrence B. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 4:35 am
Lamone, with election-law expert Richard Pildes. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 4:08 pm
Liptak quotes lawprof Richard Pildes:"It's deeply dangerous for Congress to change the ground rules for individual races based on a judgment about what's fair. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 8:51 am
Volume 125 · April 2012 · Number 6 ARTICLE Inventing the “Traditional Concept” of Sex Discrimination Cary Franklin BOOK REVIEWS Law and the President Richard H. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 4:40 pm
The Neglected Value of Effective Government by Richard H. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 7:42 am
At the Election Law Blog, Richard Pildes analyzes the “Purcell” doctrine in election litigation, writing that the doctrine is “not a principle of substantive, federal constitutional law,” which means that “it does not apply to state courts addressing election-law claim. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 4:10 am
” At the Election Law Blog, Richard Pildes notes that “several Justices raised questions about whether partisan-gerrymandering challenges implicitly appeal in one way or another to a baseline of proportional representation (PR),” but Pildes points out that “political scientists have long understood that a system of single-member districting, such as we use for Congress, should not be expected to produce PR. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 1:11 pm
— Richard M. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 7:33 am
In addition to again sampling the law review literature, this year I carefully read through the account of the decision in The Law of Democracy, a casebook by Sam Issacharoff, Pam Karlan, and Richard Pildes. [read post]
2 Jun 2007, 5:52 am
Next week, at Hebrew University, there is a fascinating conference entitled, Democracy and Rationality, which will include such political figures as Ehud Barak, Yuli Tamir and Dan Meridor, and scholars such as Samuel Issacharoff, speaking on "Democracy and the Problem of Collective Decision-Making"; Richard Pildes, and Michael Walzer. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 7:12 am
Lyle Denniston covered the oral argument for this blog, with other coverage coming from Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal; commentary on the issues involved in the case comes from Rick Pildes at Balkinization. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
” I have chided my friends Pam Karlen, Sam Issacharoff, and Richard Pildes for titling their widely used casebook on election law The Law of Democracy. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 10:27 am
Slaughter Professor of Law at Yale Law School Richard H. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:19 am
In an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, Richard Hasen suggests that “[d]eciding Gill and Benisek together would allow the court, in announcing a new partisan-gerrymandering rule, to say that sometimes the rule favors one party and sometimes it favors the other. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 11:20 am
Foley, Pildes, McConnell, and Bradley rarely agree on much of anything. [read post]
27 May 2010, 10:00 am
Also reportedly set to appear as witnesses are two constitutional law professors: Christina Duffy Burnett of Columbia University and Richard Pildes of New York University. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 1:13 pm
Like Rick Pildes (himself borrowing from earlier political scientists), Aldrich also emphasizes the collapse of the schizoid Democratic Party following the Voting Rights Act of 1965, when the “big tent” of Northern liberals and Southern white racists disappeared, with many of the latter, of course, migrating to the Republican Party in the aftermath of Barry Goldwater’s vote against the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and, more importantly, Richard… [read post]
17 May 2018, 4:26 am
At the Election Law Blog, Richard Pildes maintains that the partisan-gerrymanding cases currently before the court exhibit “much starker, more extreme records of partisan intent than in the two major prior cases from past decades,” and he “wonders whether a majority of the Court will find it so easy to permit all this to continue without any judicial constraint. [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 9:50 am
" --Richard H. [read post]