Search for: "Richard Pildes"
Results 121 - 140
of 174
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2011, 9:04 pm
, PrawfsBlawg, Aug. 14, 2011, by Rick Hills Why John Edwards Probably Did Not Commit A Crime, Regardless of His Motives or Those of The Donors, Election Law Blog, June 4, 2011, by Richard Pildes Legal Theory Lexicon: Legal Theory, Jurisprudence, and the Philosophy of Law, Legal Theory Blog, Apr. 24, 2011, by Lawrence B. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 1:06 pm
.), written by Samuel Issacharoff, Pamela Karlan, and Richard Pildes, is now available. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 5:45 am
Richard H. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 5:30 pm
Richard H. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 2:02 pm
Texas," Kenneth Mack of Harvard Law School on "Depression and Dissent: The Idea of Structural Inequality in the Civil Rights Politics of the 1930s," Richard Pildes of New York University on "Dissent in the Legal Academy and the Temptations of Power," Ravit Reichman of Brown University on "The Ethics of an Alternative: Counterfactuals and the Tone of Dissent," and Mark Tushnet of Harvard Law School on… [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 10:37 pm
For example, in a 2005 essay, Samuel Issacharoff and Richard H. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 9:43 am
Pildes. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 7:20 pm
" Law professor Richard H. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 5:55 am
Richard H. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 5:00 am
Richard Pildes For decades after Alexander Bickel’s work, concern with the “countermajoritarian difficulty”– the question of how to justify judicial review in a democratic society–dominated American constitutional scholarship. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 10:15 am
Richard H. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 10:33 am
For several generations now, the US legal culture has almost universally accepted an account of our history that goes like this: The 1870s through the 1920s was the “formalist age,” when most lawyers and judges believed that law is comprehensive, gapless, internally consistent, and logically ordered, and that judges mechanically deduce single right answers in cases. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 5:40 am
Richard H. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 8:11 am
Richard H. [read post]
27 May 2010, 10:00 am
Also reportedly set to appear as witnesses are two constitutional law professors: Christina Duffy Burnett of Columbia University and Richard Pildes of New York University. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 8:26 pm
Filed under: Conference Announcements, Lectures, Research findings, teleconferences Tagged: California gay marriage debates, California Proposition 8 debates, CARD Calls, Communication About Research and Professional Development, Edward Schiappa, Gay marriage, Legal argument, Legal argumentation, Legal communication, Legal informatics conferences, Legal rhetoric, National Communication Association, NCA, NCA CARD Calls, Policy communication, Political communication, Proposition 8, Rhetorical analysis… [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 4:25 am
Richard H. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 8:06 am
The panels include an all-star list of public law scholars and political scientists, including Rick Pildes, Sam Issacharoff, Bruce Cain, Beth Garrett, Mathew McCubbins, Brad Smith, Nate Persily, Elisabeth Gerber, Rick Hasen, Gary Jacobson, Richard Briffault, Mark Rush, Stephen Ansolabehere, J. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 8:00 pm
Pildes (New York University). [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 6:09 am
 The contributors are Peter Strauss, Richard Pildes, Stephen Calabresi and Christopher Yoo, Harold Bruff, and Gary Lawson. [read post]
