Search for: "Richard Pildes" Results 161 - 180 of 185
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2008, 1:15 pm
  Legal Structures of Democracy ,   Richard Pildes   20. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 8:51 am
(both Texas), as well as Daryl Levinson (Harvard) and Richard Pildes (NYU), among others, have argued that it's not the separation of powers per se between the three branches of government that insures checks... [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 4:08 pm
Liptak quotes lawprof Richard Pildes:"It's deeply dangerous for Congress to change the ground rules for individual races based on a judgment about what's fair. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 8:15 am
Congratulations to Randy Barnett (Georgetown), Richard Pildes (NYU), Richard Primus (Michigan), and Katherinve V.W. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 3:09 am
The winners are Randy Barnett (Georgetown), Richard Pildes (NYU), Richard Primus (Michigan), and Katherine V.W. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:37 am
They are: Mark Kelman (Stanford), William Landes (University of Chicago), Richard Pildes (NYU), Margaret Jane Radin (Michigan; also Emerita, Stanford), Reva Siegel (Yale), Associate Justice John... [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 10:35 am
In this issue, we present Professor Persily's summary of his article with responses by Ellen Katz and Richard Pildes. [read post]
9 Dec 2007, 4:00 pm
This week The Pocket Part is publishing the first of two issues discussing Nathaniel Persily's article, Professor Persily's summary of his article (http://thepocketpart.org/2007/12/10/persily.html) with responses by Ellen Katz (http://thepocketpart.org/2007/12 /10/katz.html) and Richard Pildes. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 7:33 am
In addition to again sampling the law review literature, this year I carefully read through the account of the decision in The Law of Democracy, a casebook by Sam Issacharoff, Pam Karlan, and Richard Pildes. [read post]
2 Sep 2007, 11:25 am
As Levinson and Richard Pildes argue, if one wants to guarantee oversight, one has to redesign our institutions to take account of the reality of party systems. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 9:20 pm
Rick Pildes of NYU weighs in here, and Rick Hasen of Loyola Law School has his thoughts here. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 4:26 pm
FEC), Richard Pildes highlights how a seemingly technical insistence on the protection of "issue ads" may undo the whole edifice of regulation: [T]he analogy to the regulation of pornography is hard to miss here; there, the Court held that as long as sexual material had any other "redeeming social value," the First Amendment protected it. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 3:26 pm
Some early news reports: AP Bloomberg Reuters Legal Times (Tony Mauro/Law.com) Blogospheric reaction: Rick Pildes Marty Lederman Richard Briffault Bob Bauer Interest group reaction: Gerry Hebert, Campaign Legal Center Democracy 21 My initial reactions are here. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 10:27 am
The following post is from Richard H. [read post]