Search for: "Richard Primus"
Results 1 - 20
of 143
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2024, 2:56 pm
Barbara Lauriat, Borrowing Goodwill Comparative/historical approach to doctrine/theory. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
Richard Primus, After the Sack of Jerusalem28. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 6:00 am
Introduction Sometimes a case is referred to as "canonical. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:33 am
Pace a suggestion by Richard Primus, the point of this, as explained at CGC 29, is not at all to bracket the question of ultimate ends for the sake of civil peace and out of respect for comprehensive disagreements, but rather on grounds of the scholarly division of labor, in order to respect the limits of my own competence as a civil lawyer rather than a canon lawyer or theologian). [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
Richard Primus Adrian Vermeule’s Common Good Constitutionalism has a simple and powerful frame. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 6:00 am
.), Richard Primus (Michigan), and myself.At the conclusion, Adrian will respond to the commentators. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 7:59 am
Revisionist scholars like Jack Balkin and Richard Primus argue that expansive federal powers are consistent with the principles of the Founding, the views of the early Congress, and/or Marshall Court decisions like McCulloch. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 12:16 pm
SCHWARTZ (UW Law), JONATHAN GIENAPP, JOHN MIKHAIL, and RICHARD PRIMUS Historical inquiry into constitutional meaning is distorted by long-standing received narratives and interpretations that are shaped by the political triumph and electoral dominance of the Jeffersonian-Republican and Jacksonian-Democratic parties between 1800 and 1860. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
Richard Primus The Reconstruction Amendments embody the greatest set of changes to the U.S. constitutional system since the 1780s. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 9:30 pm
The commentators are Christopher Green (Mississippi), Sandy Levinson (Texas), Gerard Magliocca (Indiana), Jennifer Mascot (George Mason), Darrell Miller (Duke), Richard Primus (Michigan), Bradley Rebeiro (BYU), Lee Strang (Toledo), Lea Vandervelde (Iowa), and Jack Balkin (Yale). [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 6:00 am
This week at Balkinization we are hosting a symposium on Kurt Lash's new two volume collection, The Reconstruction Amendments: The Essential Documents (University of Chicago Press, 2021)(2 vols.).We have assembled a terrific group of commentators, including Christopher Green (Mississippi), Sandy Levinson (Texas), Gerard Magliocca (Indiana), Jennifer Mascot (George Mason), Darrell Miller (Duke), Richard Primus (Michigan), Bradley Rebeiro (BYU), Lee Strang (Toledo),… [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:06 am
“The Supreme Court in a Polarized America — Professors Leah Litman, Julian Mortenson and Richard Primus”: Michigan Law has posted the video of this recent event on YouTube. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 6:33 pm
For obvious reasons, I am fascinated by the "report from the field" filed by Richard Primus about his students' response to reading John Hart Ely's Democracy and Distrust in 2020. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 3:43 am
” At Politico Magazine (via How Appealing), Richard Primus suggests that “maybe [Roberts’] approaching the role like an umpire, rather than playing this or that angle on the trial, is … the best way to make the Court look the way he has always hoped it would. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 10:42 am
And online at Politico Magazine, law professor Richard Primus has an essay titled “John Roberts Finally Gets His Day as Umpire; In a high-level drama with very few surprises, the newest character could also be the most consequential — and also the hardest to predict. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 7:15 pm
Richard Primus summed up my argument in his entry in a symposiumon the book on Balkinization blog last month:The book’s studied ambivalence about the canonical status of McCulloch is partly a function of McCulloch’s capacity to retard as well as to advance national power, and thus to vindicate or repress the spirit of the Constitution, depending on who is using it. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 10:30 am
Richard Primus, Marshaling McCulloch3. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
Mikhail, as I noted above, is the leading figure along with Richard Primus in an emerging body of scholarship suggesting that the Constitution’s grant of powers was not so limited. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
(Richard Primus is writing what will be an equally indispensable book designed to lay to rest this commonplace conception that is all too often left unexamined, in part, perhaps, because Marshall is thought to have said it.) [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
Contributors are Mark Graber (Maryland), Mark Killenbeck (Arkansas), Kurt Lash (Richmond), Sanford Levinson (Texas), John Mikhail (Georgetown), Christina Mulligan (Brooklyn), Victoria Nourse (Georgetown), Richard Primus (Michigan), and Franita Tolson (USC).And over at U.S. [read post]
