Search for: "Richard Primus" Results 1 - 20 of 125
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2020, 8:54 pm by Rick Hasen
Richard Primus and Cameron Kistler have posted this draft on SSRN (forthcoming Fordham Law Review). [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 6:33 pm by Sandy Levinson
For obvious reasons, I am fascinated by the "report from the field" filed by Richard Primus about his students' response to reading John Hart Ely's Democracy and Distrust in 2020. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
” At Politico Magazine (via How Appealing), Richard Primus suggests that “maybe [Roberts’] approaching the role like an umpire, rather than playing this or that angle on the trial, is … the best way to make the Court look the way he has always hoped it would. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 10:42 am by Howard Bashman
And online at Politico Magazine, law professor Richard Primus has an essay titled “John Roberts Finally Gets His Day as Umpire; In a high-level drama with very few surprises, the newest character could also be the most consequential — and also the hardest to predict. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 7:15 pm by Guest
Richard Primus summed up my argument in his entry in a symposiumon the book on Balkinization blog last month:The book’s studied ambivalence about the canonical status of McCulloch is partly a function of McCulloch’s capacity to retard as well as to advance national power, and thus to vindicate or repress the spirit of the Constitution, depending on who is using it. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Guest Blogger
Mikhail, as I noted above, is the leading figure along with Richard Primus in an emerging body of scholarship suggesting that the Constitution’s grant of powers was not so limited. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  (Richard Primus is writing what will be an equally indispensable book designed to lay to rest this commonplace conception that is all too often left unexamined, in part, perhaps, because Marshall is thought to have said it.) [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
  Contributors are Mark Graber (Maryland), Mark Killenbeck (Arkansas), Kurt Lash (Richmond), Sanford Levinson (Texas), John Mikhail (Georgetown), Christina Mulligan (Brooklyn), Victoria Nourse (Georgetown), Richard Primus (Michigan), and Franita Tolson (USC).And over at U.S. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 6:00 am by John Mikhail
Maryland (Oxford University Press, 2019).We have assembled a terrific group of commentators, including Mark Graber (Maryland), Mark Killenbeck (Arkansas), Kurt Lash (Richmond), Sanford Levinson (Texas), Christina Mulligan (Brooklyn), Victoria Nourse (Georgetown), Richard Primus (Michigan), Franita Tolson (USC), and myself.At the conclusion, David will respond to the commentators. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 7:18 pm by Howard Bashman
“The Supreme Court Case Testing the Limits of Gorsuch’s Textualism; If the justice rules against LGBTQ protections, he’ll be admitting that, deep down, he knows his judicial philosophy is deeply flawed”: Law professor Richard Primus has this essay online at Politico Magazine. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 12:20 pm by John Mikhail
  To celebrate the book and its authors, the Center held a symposium at Georgetown that featured critical responses to A Great Power of Attorney by Ethan Leib and Jed Shugerman, Richard Primus, Suzanna Sherry, and myself. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
Michigan Law Professor Richard Primus accepted Tushnet's account, and criticized Justice Gorsuch for relying on a "fictionalized account of the facts behind Schechter Poultry. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
” At Balkinization, Richard Primus takes issue with Justice Neil Gorsuch’s “choice to use [John] Locke as a guide to the Framers’ ideas about the separation of powers” in Gorsuch’s dissent in Gundy v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 8:44 am by Sandy Levinson
Both Mark Tushnet’s and then Richard Primus’s posts, each on Justice Gorsuch’s overconfident assertions about highly debatable matters of historical fact and intellectual analysis, raise important questions not only about judicial over-confidence when opining, but also about the education that judges bring with them to the bench. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 10:42 am by Howard Bashman
United States”: At the “Balkinization” blog, Richard Primus has a post that begins, “An earlier post on this blog by Mark Tushnet explained that Justice Gorsuch’s dissent in Gundy v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 7:48 am by Steve Lubet
 Powe Jr., Anne Green Regents Chair in Law, University of Texas at Austin School of Law Richard Primus, Theodore J. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 5:38 am by John Mikhail
For the symposium on Lawrence Lessig, Fidelity and Constraint: How the Supreme Court Has Read the American Constitution (Oxford University Press, 2019).Fidelity & Constraint is a deeply interesting and insightful book. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 6:55 pm by Howard Bashman
” Online at Politico Magazine, law professor Richard Primus has an essay titled “John Roberts Just Called Out the Trump Administration for Lying; Will he have the stomach to do it again? [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 9:12 am by Will Baude
The piece responds in part to criticisms raised by Richard Primus, Mark Greenberg, Mikołaj Barczentewicz, and Charles Barzun, among others (and Eric Segall is publishing a response here). [read post]