Search for: "Richard Primus"
Results 21 - 40
of 143
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
Maryland (Oxford University Press, 2019).We have assembled a terrific group of commentators, including Mark Graber (Maryland), Mark Killenbeck (Arkansas), Kurt Lash (Richmond), Sanford Levinson (Texas), Christina Mulligan (Brooklyn), Victoria Nourse (Georgetown), Richard Primus (Michigan), Franita Tolson (USC), and myself.At the conclusion, David will respond to the commentators. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 7:18 pm
“The Supreme Court Case Testing the Limits of Gorsuch’s Textualism; If the justice rules against LGBTQ protections, he’ll be admitting that, deep down, he knows his judicial philosophy is deeply flawed”: Law professor Richard Primus has this essay online at Politico Magazine. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 12:20 pm
To celebrate the book and its authors, the Center held a symposium at Georgetown that featured critical responses to A Great Power of Attorney by Ethan Leib and Jed Shugerman, Richard Primus, Suzanna Sherry, and myself. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 5:00 am
Michigan Law Professor Richard Primus accepted Tushnet's account, and criticized Justice Gorsuch for relying on a "fictionalized account of the facts behind Schechter Poultry. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 4:23 am
” At Balkinization, Richard Primus takes issue with Justice Neil Gorsuch’s “choice to use [John] Locke as a guide to the Framers’ ideas about the separation of powers” in Gorsuch’s dissent in Gundy v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 8:44 am
Both Mark Tushnet’s and then Richard Primus’s posts, each on Justice Gorsuch’s overconfident assertions about highly debatable matters of historical fact and intellectual analysis, raise important questions not only about judicial over-confidence when opining, but also about the education that judges bring with them to the bench. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 10:42 am
United States”: At the “Balkinization” blog, Richard Primus has a post that begins, “An earlier post on this blog by Mark Tushnet explained that Justice Gorsuch’s dissent in Gundy v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 7:48 am
Powe Jr., Anne Green Regents Chair in Law, University of Texas at Austin School of Law Richard Primus, Theodore J. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 5:38 am
For the symposium on Lawrence Lessig, Fidelity and Constraint: How the Supreme Court Has Read the American Constitution (Oxford University Press, 2019).Fidelity & Constraint is a deeply interesting and insightful book. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 6:55 pm
” Online at Politico Magazine, law professor Richard Primus has an essay titled “John Roberts Just Called Out the Trump Administration for Lying; Will he have the stomach to do it again? [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 9:12 am
The piece responds in part to criticisms raised by Richard Primus, Mark Greenberg, Mikołaj Barczentewicz, and Charles Barzun, among others (and Eric Segall is publishing a response here). [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 1 April 2019 Richard Spearman QC heard the last day of the trial in Otuo v The Watchtower Bible and Tract Society (previously heard 12-14 and 25 to 29 March 2019). [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 7:53 pm
Other notable liberal critics of court-packing include former Obama White House Counsel Bob Bauer, columnist Damon Linker (who calls it "the dumbest Democratic idea yet") and well-known legal scholar Richard Primus. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 5:46 pm
“To Save Obamacare, Repeal the Mandate; Giving Republicans a symbolic victory could allow Democrats to preserve the ACA”: Law professors Nicholas Bagley and Richard Primus have this essay online at The Atlantic. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 6:22 am
Anne Joseph O’Connell joins us to discuss the appointment of Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker, and Richard Primus gives us the lowdown on different methods of constitutional interpretation. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 5:12 am
He later adds in a quip by Ann Richards that gives it a more woke gloss. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 3:14 am
(I discussed this judicial/political entrenchment phenomenon at greater length back in early October.)On the broader question of whether the representational imbalance in the Senate is justifiable and/or lamentable, I highly recommend (i) this very interesting recent post by Mike Dorf in which he concludes that although "the Senate is a problem, . . . it is not a problem that systematically disfavors Democrats, except in the short run"; (ii) Richard… [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 10:47 am
Richard Primus, University of Michigan Law School, has posted The Republic in Long-Term Perspective, which is forthcoming in the Michigan Law Review:This essay explores the threat that the Trump Administration poses to the Republic from a long-term constitutional-regime perspective. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 4:07 am
Cross-posted at Just Security.Not surprisingly, most early reports of the Supreme Court’s decision last Tuesday in Trump v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm
., NW, Washington, DC, on Sunday, July 8 at 1:00 PM.Tonight at 10:45 pm, C-SPAN 3 airs the discussion, held in Supreme Court chamber and co-hosted by the Supreme Court Historical Society and the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation, between Randy Barnett, Georgetown University, and Richard Primus, University of Michigan, on interpreting the U.S. [read post]
