Search for: "Richard Primus" Results 41 - 60 of 125
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2019, 10:42 am by Howard Bashman
United States”: At the “Balkinization” blog, Richard Primus has a post that begins, “An earlier post on this blog by Mark Tushnet explained that Justice Gorsuch’s dissent in Gundy v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 10:31 am by Andrew Hamm
” Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg put this question to scholars Richard Primus and Randy Barnett on Tuesday at the Supreme Court, interrupting their debate over modes of constitutional interpretation. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 6:22 am by First Mondays
 Anne Joseph O’Connell joins us to discuss the appointment of Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker, and Richard Primus gives us the lowdown on different methods of constitutional interpretation. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
  Contributors are Mark Graber (Maryland), Mark Killenbeck (Arkansas), Kurt Lash (Richmond), Sanford Levinson (Texas), John Mikhail (Georgetown), Christina Mulligan (Brooklyn), Victoria Nourse (Georgetown), Richard Primus (Michigan), and Franita Tolson (USC).And over at U.S. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 8:58 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  In any case, I have learned a great deal from the recent non-debate between Professors Michael Dorf and Richard Primus, which they have waged this month here on Dorf on Law and on Take Care. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 10:47 am by Dan Ernst
Richard Primus, University of Michigan Law School, has posted The Republic in Long-Term Perspective, which is forthcoming in the Michigan Law Review:This essay explores the threat that the Trump Administration poses to the Republic from a long-term constitutional-regime perspective. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
" As I wrote, whatever might be said in favor of a system that deviates from strict population-based representation, the very out-of-balance ratios one sees in the US Senate cannot be normatively justified.Professor Richard Primus wrote a thoughtful response to my essay. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 6:33 pm by Sandy Levinson
For obvious reasons, I am fascinated by the "report from the field" filed by Richard Primus about his students' response to reading John Hart Ely's Democracy and Distrust in 2020. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 8:44 am by Sandy Levinson
Both Mark Tushnet’s and then Richard Primus’s posts, each on Justice Gorsuch’s overconfident assertions about highly debatable matters of historical fact and intellectual analysis, raise important questions not only about judicial over-confidence when opining, but also about the education that judges bring with them to the bench. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:24 pm by David Kopel
Richard Primus provided some thoughtful commentary on my presentation, and the FedSoc organization was outstanding. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 5:34 am by Guest Blogger
Calabresi and Shams HirjiProfessor Richard Primus, writing for the Harvard Law Review Blog, claims that our proposed judgeship bill violates past practice and norms of conventional behavior. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 11:49 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
I'm particularly pleased that my friend Brian Kalt, who is a terrific scholar, now has a proposal named for him coined by another friend, Richard Primus, who also does fantastic work.Having said that, I want to comment that Richard's hypothetical Idaho scenario is not far removed from what occurred in 1802 when Congress engaged in "court-shrinking. [read post]
25 Nov 2017, 8:16 am by Mark Tushnet
(Remember, the Republicans modified the filibuster rule for Supreme Court nominations, by simple majority.)Balkin also points to Richard Primus's post on the Harvard Law Review blog, in which Primus argues that the proposal is inconsistent with norms currently embedded in the small-c Constitution. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 8:00 am by Ilya Somin
But legal scholar Richard Primus claims that libertarians should also dislike Johnson’s comment that he would seek to appoint”people that look at the Constitution of original intent”: To my knowledge, the world of libertarian commentators had no negative reaction to this comment by Johnson. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 1:42 pm by Guest Blogger
Likewise, the disagreement between Richard Primus and Mark Tushnet over how the Democrats should respond to the mistreatment of Chief Judge Merrick Garland or any enactment of the proposal of Steven Calabresi and Shams Hirji to pack the lower federal courts indicates that “Court Packing, The Sequel” is unlikely to divide people simply along party lines.3. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 3:14 am by Marty Lederman
  (I discussed this judicial/political entrenchment phenomenon at greater length back in early October.)On the broader question of whether the representational imbalance in the Senate is justifiable and/or lamentable, I highly recommend (i) this very interesting recent post by Mike Dorf in which he concludes that although "the Senate is a problem, . . . it is not a problem that systematically disfavors Democrats, except in the short run"; (ii) Richard… [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 7:28 am by Randy Barnett
 It was a dynamite line-up with the super smart (and fellow Guggenheim Fellow) Richard Primus (Michigan), conservative originalist John McGinnis (Northwestern), and originalism critic Mitch Berman (Texas). [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 9:16 am by Randy Barnett
 Ilya Somin (George Mason), The Original Scope of Federal and State Power over Immigration Commentator: Richard Primus (Michigan) [read post]