Search for: "Richard Primus"
Results 41 - 60
of 143
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2018, 4:20 am
” Additional coverage comes from Kevin Daley at The Daily Caller and Bob Egelko at the San Francisco Chronicle, Additional commentary and analysis come from Adam Serwer at The Atlantic, Aaron Blake at The Washington Post, Leah Litman at Take Care, Aziz Huq at Take Care, Richard Primus, also at Take Care, Michelle Boorstein at The Washington Post, Peter Schuck in an op-ed for The New York Times, Will Baude at PrawfsBlawg, Dana Milbank in an op-ed for The Washington Post, and… [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 10:00 am
Richard Primus, University of Michigan Law School, has posted the “The Essential Characteristic”: Enumerated Powers and the Bank of the United States, which is forthcoming in the Michigan Law Review:The idea that Congress can legislate only on the basis of its enumerated powers is an orthodox proposition of constitutional law, one that is generally supposed to have been recognized as essential ever since the Founding. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:16 am
” At Politico Magazine, Richard Primus considers the implications of the decision in Masterpiece for Trump v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 1:11 pm
For the three remaining hours of the hearing, he sat quietly, watching Carvin tangle with Richard Primus—arguing for the plaintiffs—on the merits of the Section 1985(3) claim. [read post]
11 May 2018, 9:30 pm
Last Tuesday, at an event sponsored by the Supreme Court Historical Society, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg asked Richard Primus and Randy Barnett how each would have decided Loving v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 10:31 am
” Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg put this question to scholars Richard Primus and Randy Barnett on Tuesday at the Supreme Court, interrupting their debate over modes of constitutional interpretation. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 6:00 am
At the Symposium, a group of constitutional professors from area law schools will join Professors Lawson and Seidman and paper authors Ethan Leib (Fordham), John Mikhail (Georgetown), Richard Primus (Michigan) and Suzanna Sherry (Vanderbilt) to discuss the issues raised by the book and papers—which will be published in a special issue of the Georgetown Journal of Law and Public Policy. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 9:30 pm
On May 8, the Supreme Court Historical Society and the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation will cosponsor a conversation between Professors Randy Barnett and Richard Primus about Modes Of Constitutional Interpretation. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 7:10 am
The John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation & the Supreme Court Historical Society are sponsoring a conversation between Michigan law professor Richard Primus and me on Modes of Constitutional Interpretation. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 7:27 am
Richard Primus discusses an amicus brief he wrote in Zervos v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 10:44 am
One that Strauss did not address that is part of my book is that the Bill of Rights is a "continuity tender," which my co-blogger Richard Primus defined in a recent article as "not a principle with practical consequences, but a ritual statement with which practitioners identify themselves with a history from which they descend. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 7:42 pm
"Senator Flake isn't a Liberal, and Neither is Chief Justice Roberts": Richard Primus has this post at the "Balkinization" blog. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 6:11 pm
Richard Primus takes down the arguments that Chief Justice Roberts has become (or always has been) a secret liberal and has "moved left. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 10:04 am
Make no mistake about it Professor Primus. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 11:49 am
I'm particularly pleased that my friend Brian Kalt, who is a terrific scholar, now has a proposal named for him coined by another friend, Richard Primus, who also does fantastic work.Having said that, I want to comment that Richard's hypothetical Idaho scenario is not far removed from what occurred in 1802 when Congress engaged in "court-shrinking. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 10:28 am
" Richard Primus has this post at the "Balkinization" blog. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 7:30 am
As Richard Primus recognizes in the most thoughtful critique of the Calabresi-Hirji paper, court-packing does not violate the text of the Constitution. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 5:34 am
Calabresi and Shams HirjiProfessor Richard Primus, writing for the Harvard Law Review Blog, claims that our proposed judgeship bill violates past practice and norms of conventional behavior. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 1:42 pm
Likewise, the disagreement between Richard Primus and Mark Tushnet over how the Democrats should respond to the mistreatment of Chief Judge Merrick Garland or any enactment of the proposal of Steven Calabresi and Shams Hirji to pack the lower federal courts indicates that “Court Packing, The Sequel” is unlikely to divide people simply along party lines.3. [read post]
25 Nov 2017, 8:16 am
(Remember, the Republicans modified the filibuster rule for Supreme Court nominations, by simple majority.)Balkin also points to Richard Primus's post on the Harvard Law Review blog, in which Primus argues that the proposal is inconsistent with norms currently embedded in the small-c Constitution. [read post]
