Search for: "Richard Primus"
Results 101 - 120
of 143
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2017, 6:00 am
"Richard Primus, also of this blog, has written a fascinating essay about the proposal on the Harvard Law Review's new blog. [read post]
24 Nov 2016, 7:46 am
And now:Guest post by Richard Kramer and Brett Simpson, both of Arete ResearchStandard-essential patents: more rationality and a shift to China, but where are tech's titans? [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 11:27 am
Rosenberg’s article summarizes pretty accurately the talks by Jack Balkin (Yale), Richard Primus (Michigan), Eugene Kontorovich (Northwestern), and me on how Judaism affected our approaches to the Constitution. [read post]
31 May 2017, 4:59 am
” At Politico, Richard Primus points out that “the travel-ban case offers [Justice Anthony] Kennedy the chance to overrule a widely reviled decision that has never been officially overruled: Korematsu v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 7:30 am
As Richard Primus recognizes in the most thoughtful critique of the Calabresi-Hirji paper, court-packing does not violate the text of the Constitution. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 6:55 pm
” Online at Politico Magazine, law professor Richard Primus has an essay titled “John Roberts Just Called Out the Trump Administration for Lying; Will he have the stomach to do it again? [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 4:53 pm
--Richard Primus, Professor of Law, University of Michigan Conservatives claim to be the Constitution's only true believers. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 12:16 pm
SCHWARTZ (UW Law), JONATHAN GIENAPP, JOHN MIKHAIL, and RICHARD PRIMUS Historical inquiry into constitutional meaning is distorted by long-standing received narratives and interpretations that are shaped by the political triumph and electoral dominance of the Jeffersonian-Republican and Jacksonian-Democratic parties between 1800 and 1860. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 10:47 am
As put by Professor Richard Primus, by narrowing disparate impact liability and the class action "the court pushes the law toward [an] individualistic vision of sex discrimination. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:16 am
” At Politico Magazine, Richard Primus considers the implications of the decision in Masterpiece for Trump v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 3:43 am
” At Politico Magazine (via How Appealing), Richard Primus suggests that “maybe [Roberts’] approaching the role like an umpire, rather than playing this or that angle on the trial, is … the best way to make the Court look the way he has always hoped it would. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
Richard Primus The Reconstruction Amendments embody the greatest set of changes to the U.S. constitutional system since the 1780s. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 10:04 am
Make no mistake about it Professor Primus. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
As Graber notes, my political account ends with the resignation of Richard Nixon, and a lot has gone on since then. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:33 am
Pace a suggestion by Richard Primus, the point of this, as explained at CGC 29, is not at all to bracket the question of ultimate ends for the sake of civil peace and out of respect for comprehensive disagreements, but rather on grounds of the scholarly division of labor, in order to respect the limits of my own competence as a civil lawyer rather than a canon lawyer or theologian). [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 6:24 am
” (Richard Primus refers to this kind of interpretive re-prioritizing of Supreme Court decisions by courts of appeals as “underruling. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 6:25 am
She also suggested I add Eve Primus' article, "Culture as a Structural Problem in Indigent Defense" to the list. [read post]
1 May 2014, 10:48 am
Richard PrimusBruce Ackerman long ago persuaded me that Article V has not been the only route—or even the normal route—to legitimate constitutional change. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 9:12 am
The piece responds in part to criticisms raised by Richard Primus, Mark Greenberg, Mikołaj Barczentewicz, and Charles Barzun, among others (and Eric Segall is publishing a response here). [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 7:49 am
With all due respect, the piece by Justice Stephen Markman of the Michigan Supreme Court seems to fit the bill this time, and it is very effectively eviscerated by Richard Primus. [read post]
