Search for: "Richards v. Board of Education" Results 1 - 20 of 513
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2010, 3:28 am by Lawrence Solum
Bd. of Education: Unconstitutional Conditions and Public Employment (FIRST AMENDMENT LAW STORIES, Richard W. [read post]
17 May 2009, 6:31 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Board of Education, decided May 17, 1954, became the Supreme Court’s definitive judgment on segregation in American education. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 9:22 pm by Paul Horwitz
In particular, Horace Mann, secretary of the Massachusetts board of education, instituted "a strategy described as 'a stroke of genius.' Mann insisted on Bible reading, without commentary, as the foundation of moral education. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 6:53 am
Amber Taylor criticizes Judge Richard Posner's opinion in Brandt v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 10:57 am by Lrwprofs
The piece begins by focusing on West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 4:59 pm by Eugene Volokh
App. 1998) (teacher falsified employee time records); Board of Educ. of Hopkins County v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Board of Education—the landmark 1954 Supreme Court ruling invalidating de jure segregation in public schools—was rightly decided. [read post]
Unsatisfactory rating voided because employee's "performance review," failed to comply with the employer's own procedures and thus undermined the integrity of the process Joyce v City of New York, 2018 NY Slip Op 03433, Appellate Division, First Department The Appellate Division annulled the determination of respondent New York City Department of Education [DOE] sustaining the "unsatisfactory" rating for the 2010-2011 academic year give to John Joyce, a tenured teacher. The court said that the record demonstrates "deficiencies in the performance review process" that resulted in Mr. Joyce being given an unsatisfactory rating for the 2010-2011 academic year. Citing Matter of Gumbs v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of the City of N.Y., 125 AD3d 484, and Matter of Richards v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of the City of N.Y., 117 AD3d 605, the Appellate Division noted that these deficiencies "were not merely technical, but undermined the integrity and fairness of the process." Mr. Joyce had received a satisfactory rating for the previous academic year and, in contravention of its own procedures, DOE failed to place him on notice that he was in danger of receiving an unsatisfactory rating for the 2010-2011 academic year until after April 28, 2011. Although DOE's procedures required that tenured teachers in danger of receiving an unsatisfactory rating have "formal observations including a pre-observation and post-observation conference by the principal ... as part of a prescriptive plan to improve their teaching," Mr. Joyce received only one formal observation which took place one week before the end of the academic year and was not part of a prescriptive plan to improve his performance as a teacher. The decision is posted on the Internet at: http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_03433.htm
30 May 2018, 4:37 am by Public Employment Law Press
Dist. of the City of N.Y., 125 AD3d 484, and Matter of Richards v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 10:00 am by Ezra Rosser
TestyPresident and Chief Executive Officer, Law School Admissions Council (LSAC) Richard M. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 1:07 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
 As the Supreme Court confirmed in New Process Steel v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 10:31 am by Andrew Hamm
Board of Education,” “the one that, more than anything else, was meant to end apartheid in America. [read post]