Search for: "Richards v. Cox" Results 61 - 80 of 146
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2017, 10:44 am by Marty Lederman
  This explains why Richard Nixon did not try to personally remove Archibald Cox (or, for that matter, Leon Jaworski), and (as I have explained) why Donald Trump cannot fire Special Counsel Robert Mueller. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 8:34 am
A hedge fund also filed an access proposal at Reliant Energy, but the Texas-based company sought a court ruling that it was not bound by the AFSCME v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:40 am by Amy Howe
In a post at the blog of Faruki, Ireland, & Cox, Jim Smerbeck discusses the Court’s recent announcement that it would review Spokeo v. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 7:34 am by INFORRM
Richard E North v Sunday Times, Adjudication 26 November 2010. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 11:41 am by Sam Williams
The Reagan administration challenged the constitutional validity of these provisions in Morrison v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 1:39 pm by Tasha C. Taylor
No. 08-1435 (Dec. 18, 2008), establishing the availability of a writ of certiorari from a circuit court to an inferior court under Amendment 80 to the Arkansas Constitution; and Cox v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 1:48 am
No, says the European Court of Human Rights | BMG v Cox - when does an ISP lose its safe harbour protection? [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 2:45 am by NCC Staff
On July 24, 1974, a unanimous Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 12:45 am
No, says the European Court of Human Rights | BMG v Cox - when does an ISP lose its safe harbour protection? [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 3:15 am by Scott Bomboy
And in 1974, Elliot Richardson resigned when asked by President Richard Nixon to fire Watergate special prosecutor Archibald Cox. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 9:35 pm by Richard J. Pierce, Jr.
Supreme Court in February in Lucia v. [read post]