Search for: "Richards v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 8,861
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2024, 1:10 pm by Ilya Somin
Richard DeVillier and other property owners whose land was damaged by flooding caused by actions of state agencies will be able to proceed under a Texas state law cause  of action. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments Harrison v Cameron, heard 26 March 2024 (Steyn J) BW Legal Services Limited v Trustpilot,  heard 7 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Unity Plus Healthcare Limited v Clay and others,  heard 1 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Parsons v Atkinson, heard 26 and 27 February 2024 (Farbey J) Vince v Associated Newspapers, heard 19 February 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Pacini v Dow Jones, heard 13 December 2023 (HHJ Parkes KC) Wilson v… [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:48 pm by Hugh Rennie
Supreme Court decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:06 am by Steven Cohen
   The defendants subsequently hired Biomedical Expert Witness Richard C. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" The platforms challenged the law on First Amendment grounds in NetChoice v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
United States The United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued its decision to grant the Center for Countering Digital Hate’s (CCDH) motion to strike out under an anti-SLAPP statute in the case of X CCDH. [read post]