Search for: "Richards v. State" Results 261 - 280 of 8,045
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Echoing arguments by Theda Skocpol on Civil War pensions, DPADR argues that the various forms of debt relief offered by 19th-century state legislatures constituted a sort of proto-welfare state. [read post]
17 Aug 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
State legislatures nonetheless continued to pass retrospective emergency relief laws, which faced almost universal rejection by state courts under the federal contract clause. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 12:59 pm by Daniel J. Gilman
District Court for the Middle District of Florida issued a preliminary injunction in the case of Properties of the Villages Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
Even more important for Wirt was the current American state of mind, a so [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 11:11 am by Guest Blogger
  Like Joseph Story in his 1842 decision in Prigg v. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 6:41 am by Josh Blackman
His resignation came shortly after the Supreme Court unanimously decided United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
” That rule blocked many early lawsuits.In 2006, the state amended its charitable immunity law to allow religious organizations to be sued for their sexual offenses. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 12:52 pm by Bill Marler
 E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2]respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and… [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
8/5/1974: Shortly after the Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
While states’ rights often involved slavery and white supremacy, states’ rights and state sovereignty were also invoked to defend the rights of northern citizens to resist efforts to enforce the Fugitive Slave laws. [read post]