Search for: "Richards v. State" Results 481 - 500 of 8,258
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2017, 2:46 am by ASAD KHAN
Lord Carnwath agreed with Richards LJ that art 8 does not require access to the best possible procedure, but only access to an effective and fair procedure. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 3:43 am by Kaufman Dolowich Voluck
 The legislation, which was modeled from provisions in an existing State contract, would have more broadly opened the door for delay claims, beyond the narrow exceptions set forth by the New York Court of Appeals in the seminal case Corinno-Civetta Construction Corp. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 7:05 am by Adam Gillette
Judge Richard Kopf has a post over at Hercules and the Umpire about a motion in limine that the prosecution filed in Williamson County, Tennessee Circuit Court. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 10:31 pm
" Judge Crichton's website can be found at this link, where one can find this August 2008 entry titled "Ruminations on Kennedy v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 8:52 am by Amanda Frost
In a forthcoming article in the Notre Dame Law Review, The Litigation-Arbitration Dichotomy Meets the Class Action, Professor Richard Nagareda draws interesting connections between the question whether state law can bar use of the class action device in federal court – the issue in last Term’s Shady Grove v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 5:46 am by Michael C. Dorf
Here's a broadly sympathetic view of that literature by my constitutional law casebook co-editor Prof Richard Fallon. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 3:03 am by Walter Olson
The law should not accord the state of Georgia a copyright over its code of law, even if the code has annotations [Trevor Burrus and Sam Spiegelman on Cato amicus certiorari brief in State of Georgia v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:40 am by Amy Howe
Windsor in United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Rogers College of Law) has posted Mathias v Accor Economy Lodging: Judge Richard A. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 9:35 am
Richard began by stating that he does not believe the case has changed the law. [read post]