Search for: "Richards v. United States" Results 361 - 380 of 4,435
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am by admin
  To be sure, there are gaps, inconsistencies, and mistakes, but the statistics chapter should be a must-read for federal (and state) judges. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 3:29 pm by Reference Staff
Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Association, 443 U.S. 658 (1979) and Washington v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Plaintiff [also] points out that the third-party he accuses of sexual assault is a high-ranking person in well-known advocacy organizations that are active in Republican and conservative political circles, and defendant was "a key organizer of the January 6, 2021, 'Stop the Steal' rally that led to the attempted insurrection at the United States Capitol. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 7:57 am by Roger Parloff
I described then the legal landscape in which their motions to transfer venue are playing out, which is largely set by the District of Columbia Circuit’s binding, en banc 1976 ruling in United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
All courts in the United States are bound by vertical precedent to follow the holdings of decisions by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 4:40 am by Frank Cranmer
Richard Deadman: “Confession in the Anglican Church – Breaking the Seal? [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 5:59 am by Menachem Z. Rosensaft
Jews outside the United States confront conditions that are, if anything, even more dire. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 4:28 am by Emma Snell
  COVID-19 COVID-19 has infected over 101.958 million people and has now killed over 1.10 million people in the United States, according to data compiled by Johns Hopkins University. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 6:08 am by Emma Svoboda
On Jan. 17, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S, v. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
In caselaw, lawyers and historians can rely on new historical evidence to challenge previous rulings, as the Organization for Americans Historians did in Obergefell v. [read post]