Search for: "Richards v. United States" Results 761 - 780 of 3,920
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
” The third category of the statute thus prefers people who are 65 or older, giving them an entitlement to early voting by mail that younger persons do not enjoy unless they satisfy additional criteria.Plaintiffs challenged this law as violative of the Twenty-Sixth Amendment of the Constitution, which provides—also quite straightforwardly—that “[t]he right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied… [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 1:26 am by INFORRM
United States On 24 August Reuters had an article “Sarah Palin can sue New York Times for defamation – court ruling”. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 3:00 pm
He is a United Kingdom citizen and non- immigrant alien, living in the United States pursuant to a valid E-2 Visa, who at all relevant times has been residing in Sonoma, California. [read post]
5 Sep 2020, 12:36 am by Florian Mueller
Early last week, Epic Games lost the first round of its #FreeFortnite battle against Apple when Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California denied the Fortnite maker's motion for a temporary restraining order (TRO) with respect to the company's flagship game. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 4:43 am by James Romoser
” But, he continues, “it was by no means the final legal battle over educational choice in the United States. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 6:12 am by Florian Mueller
On Monday afternoon, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California held an Epic Games v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 7:34 pm by Benson Varghese
April – 26 cases for every 100 filed (compared to the state average of 53 cases for every 100 filed) March – 38 cases for every 100 filed (compared to the state average of 43) June – 50 cases for every 100 filed (compared to the state average of 58)   V. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
In addition to the temporal disconnect, the majority gave virtually no consideration to the three-way relationship between the product supplier defendants, the plaintiffs, and the plaintiffs’ employer, the United States government. [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 9:03 pm by Cary Coglianese
President Obama publicly discussed his disagreement with the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 2:45 am by NCC Staff
On July 24, 1974, a unanimous Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 10:23 am by John McFarland
Davis tried to tame the anarchy taking place across the state, but he was defeated by Richard Coke in the governor’s election of 1873. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Holder, which advanced the false assertion that voters of color are no longer subject to systematic efforts to suppress their votes; Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am by James Romoser
At the Second Thoughts Blog from the Duke Center for Firearms Law, Daniel Rice examines the court’s “void for vagueness” doctrine and how it might relate to the Second Amendment, drawing on Justice Clarence Thomas’ concurrence in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 3:49 pm by Stephen Wermiel
On July 24, the justices ruled 8-0 in United States v. [read post]