Search for: "Richards v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 3,491
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2020, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
On 7 October 2020, Facebook announced significant changes to its advertising and misinformation policies, saying it will stop running political ads in the United States after polls close on 3 November for an undetermined period of time. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  This is just the way the “state unit” system works, whatever the Supreme Court had suggested in Gray v. [read post]
10 Oct 2020, 8:00 am by Evan Lee
When the Supreme Court entertains argument on Tuesday in United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
            Despite the asymmetry between the two books, two concerns unite them that deserve critical treatment. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Yes, said Monroe County Supreme Court Justice Richard A. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 5:01 am by Sean Quirk
The joint note verbale also cites the 2016 arbitral tribunal ruling in Philippines v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 10:40 am by Ellis Cose
He had learned that many demographers thought whites would eventually become a minority race in the United States. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 7:18 pm by Legal Aggregate
Goldfarb, 430 U.S. 199 (1977)—both cases she argued—provided the basis for her opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
” This chapter discusses the attacks on the rule of law by the President and some in his orbit, including: (i) the rule of law; (ii) criticisms of laws by the President; (iii) The Hatch Act; (iv) other examples of violations; (v) military law; and (vi) pardons. 12.2 Rule of Law The President of the United States takes an oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
” The third category of the statute thus prefers people who are 65 or older, giving them an entitlement to early voting by mail that younger persons do not enjoy unless they satisfy additional criteria.Plaintiffs challenged this law as violative of the Twenty-Sixth Amendment of the Constitution, which provides—also quite straightforwardly—that “[t]he right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied… [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 8:41 am by Nathaniel Sobel
But two new sources of information—the fifth volume of the Senate Select Intelligence Committee’s bipartisan report on Russian interference in the 2016 election and New York Times reporter Michael Schmidt’s new book “Donald Trump v. the United States”—raise even more questions about the investigation. [read post]