Search for: "Richards v. United States" Results 141 - 160 of 4,291
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2014, 7:47 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here is the opinion: 13-3769_opn From the court’s syllabus: Plaintiffs‐appellants (“plaintiffs”) appeal from the denial of a preliminary injunction by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Richard J. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:46 am
On May 3, 2016, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filed what can only be described as a fascinating civil Complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (“EDNY”). [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 9:09 pm
Niemeyer on the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, and then for Chief Justice William H. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 6:00 am by Anonymous
Federal Election Committee (558 U.S. 310) was decided by the United States Supreme Court.Facts of Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 7:51 am by Steve Lash
Welcome to Monday, the 43rd anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 11:54 am by Jonathan D. Montag
Eric Holder, No. 08-1889, about which I recently wrote,  Judge Richard Posner, discussing the fact that the alien about whom the case dealt had no access to judicial review because he was outside the United States but would if he [...] [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 9:10 am by Paul Caron
Commissioner: Partners or the Partnership -- Who Is the Relevant Entity Under the Avoidance of Double Taxation Convention Between the United States and Australia? [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 3:35 pm by Ashby Jones
United States, in which they narrowed the reach of the criminal honest-services statute, has yet to be felt. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 5:21 pm by Kent Scheidegger
United States District Judge Richard Seeborg does not give a damn what the United States Supreme Court says, he is going to ensure no one is executed in California regardless of controlling precedent.In Glossip v. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am by Mark Graber
”  Senator Richard Yates similarly stated, "By the proposed amendment to the Constitution certain men are excluded from holding office, those who, having taken an oath to support the Constitution heretofore, have violated their oath. [read post]